Search for: "Sandy Levinson" Results 361 - 380 of 580
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2009, 6:10 pm
Nita Farahany has posted the following paper to SSRN: "Law and Behavioral Morality"  NOMOS LII: EVOLUTION AND MORALITY, Sandy Levinson, ed., 2009Vanderbilt Public Law Research Paper No. 09-03 NITA A. [read post]
5 May 2021, 3:30 am by W. Bradley Wendel
This is the concern animating Leah Litman’s powerful and passionate recent article – a contribution to a symposium on Jack Balkin and Sandy Levinson’s book, Democracy and Dysfunction. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 10:12 am by lennyesq
On the blog Balkinization, professors Jason Mazzone and Sandy Levinson engaged in a heated discussion as to the proper interpretation of the Supreme Court’s decision in Miranda. [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 9:11 am
Sandy Levinson's Our Undemocratic Constitution (see sidebar to right) has received much praise. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:18 am by Glenn Reynolds
” That includes people like Larry Tribe, and Sandy Levinson, whose 1992 Yale Law Journal essay, The Embarrassing Second Amendment, really kicked things off by signaling to the legal academy that it was okay to write about this. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 2:26 pm
The paper suggests that constitutional law has a substantial effect explaining legal agreements in the face of policy disagreements (would Sandy Levinson's polemics against the constitution make sense in a world in which constitutions meant anything) and explaining why constitutional conflicts are over some matters and not others. [read post]
21 May 2007, 4:24 pm
At Balkinization, Jack Balkin has this post discussing how Tom's analysis supports his and Sandy Levinson's theory of partisan entrenchment; and at Talking Points Memo, Steve Benen weighs in here. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 8:55 am by Gerard Magliocca
 Some people, like Sandy Levinson, argue that this is because those states have dysfunctional constitutions. [read post]
28 May 2014, 5:04 am
’s position is also criticized in amicus briefs by a group of citizenship scholars (Sam Erman, Nathan Perl-Rosenthal, Holly Brewer, Linda Bosniak, Kristin Collins, Rose Cuisan-Villazor, Stella Elias, Linda Kerber, Bernie Meyler, Michael Ramsey, Lucy Salyer, Rogers Smith, and Charles Venator-Santiago) and by a group of constitutional history scholars (Christina Duffy Ponsa, Gary Lawson, Sandy Levinson, Bartholomew Sparrow, and Andrew Kent), among others. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 7:14 am by Alfred Brophy
The commentary is from Hank Chambers, Ray Diamond, Paul Finkelman, Leslie Harris, and Sandy Levinson. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 6:51 am
  However, Harcourt himself advocates the "legalize and regulate" approach since the necessity defense is just a way to "legalize and regulate," as we pointed out in the article, repeating a point made by Sandy Levinson several years ago. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 9:29 pm
I see these new notable new Heller posts from around the law professor blogosphere: At Balkinization from Sandy Levinson, Does the Constitution protect a substantive right to hunt? [read post]
16 May 2016, 4:29 am by Steve Lubet
A good illustration of the exemplary analogy is Sandy Levinson’s recent post on Balkinization (and oped in the Dallas Morning News), in which he praises Alexander Hamilton’s support for Thomas Jefferson over Aaron Burr, following the electoral college tie in the election of 1800. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Constitutional Faith and Veneration, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:33 am by Guest Blogger
I do have some quibbles with Levinson’s discussion. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Second, my thanks to Jack Balkin and to the participants in this symposium:  Jack Rakove, Sandy Levinson, Franita Tolson, Ned Foley, and Jesse Wegman. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 1:09 pm by Ilya Somin
Like Sandy Levinson, I agree we should not "fetishize" traditional elections. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 6:18 am by Adam Chandler
In a post at Balkinization discussing when filibusters are justified, Sandy Levinson offers a critique of Senator Lindsey Graham’s explanation for why he will vote to confirm Elena Kagan. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 6:13 am
And in some cases, it appears from Sandy Levinson's comment on Balkinization, the student editors *are* asking for reviews of certain books and it's hard for them to get the targeted authors to agree to write the particular review. [read post]
29 May 2012, 10:28 am by Big Tent Democrat
Consider Sandy Levinson's piece, also in today's New York Times. [read post]