Search for: "Sandy Levinson" Results 381 - 400 of 580
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2015, 3:00 am by JB
  JB: Reading your book, I was reminded of my colleague Sandy Levinson, who thinks that founder worship and constitutional veneration are a terrible idea and that we should junk the Constitution and start over. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
This subject is complex—not least because, as Sandy Levinson appropriately writes, fixity is “chimerical. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 11:13 am by David Super
     Sandy Levinson, my former teacher whom I respect enormously, reads my post on the increasing opacity of the congressional appropriations process and askswhether I would agree that Congress has rendered itself illegitimate. [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Public Memory and Public Monuments, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:15 am by Guest Blogger
His misdiagnosis also seems to influence Sandy Levinson’s unduly pessimistic view of the chances for reform. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Jack Balkin and Sandy Levinson, for example, refer to the antebellum materials discussed in Kate Masur’s wonderful new book, “Until Justice Be Done: America’s First Civil Rights Movement, From the Revolution to Reconstruction,” which describes state-level civil rights efforts led by black Americans in the decades prior to the Civil War (for which Balkinization hosted an on-line symposium just prior to mine). [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 7:02 am
Here's a little selection from Sandy Levinson's and my recent article on Dred Scott that addresses this very question. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 12:01 am
  Update: For a post saying the exact opposite of everything I am saying here, see Sandy Levinson's thoughts here. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 7:39 pm by Lawrence Cunningham
   Larry Solum (Legal Theory Blog) Jack Balkin (Balkinization) Gene Volokh (Volokh Conspiracy) Orin Kerr (Volokh Conspiracy) Dick Posner (Becker-Posner) Kim Krawiec (Faculty Lounge) Al Brophy (Faculty Lounge) Sandy Levinson (Balkinization) Steve Bainbridge (Professor Bainbridge) Dan Solove (Concurring Opinions) Rick Hills (Prawfs) Paul Horwitz (Prawfs) David Luban (Balkinization) William Henderson (ELS) Dan Markel (Prawfs) Danille Citron (Concurring Opinions) Frank… [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 10:23 am by Randy Barnett
Other previous guest authors are a “Who’s Who” of con law professors: Alex Aleinikoff, Akhil Amar, Robert Bennett, David Bernstein, Frank Buckley, Laura Donohue, Garrett Epps, Jim Fleming, Alison LaCroix, Dan Farber, Elizabeth Price Foley, Christopher Fritz, Michael Gerhardt, Abner Greene, Michael Greve, Steve Griffin, Stephen Gardbaum, Philip Hamburger, Thomas Healy, John Inazu, Sandy Levinson, Gerard Magliocca, Earl Maltz, John McGinnis, Clark Neily, Mike… [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 7:55 pm
As Sandy Levinson at Balkinization laments, our Constitution starts looking a bit frayed around the edges when such a popular initiative can be stopped in its tracks by a determined president and 1/3 + 1 of one (gerrymandered and polarized) chamber of Congress. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Mark Graber
 Framers designing a constitution must decide between provisions likely capable of only one interpretation that will become part of what Sandy Levinson calls the Constitution of Settlement or provisions whose interpretation will be disputed that will become part of what Sandy Levinson calls the Constitution of Conversation. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Constitutional Faith and Veneration, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
A little over a year ago, Sandy Levinson and I published a paper arguing that Donald Trump should not enjoy all the Article II powers of past presidents. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 6:33 am by Randy Barnett
So it is fair for me to label what Sandy Levinson calls “our undemocratic constitution” as Our Republican Constitution. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 10:57 am by Mark Graber
  As many friends, most notably Sandy Levinson and Mark Tushnet have pointed out, the way in which constitutions structure politics at particular times often has more influence on who gets what from government than constitutional law. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 12:26 pm by Mark Graber
  Sandy Levinson and others think the constitutional bar on persons born abroad creates second-class citizens. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 8:55 am by Mark Graber
”  Sandy Levinson aside, very few people who label themselves constitutional theorists are concerned with the problem that occupied Madison, namely how power could best be organized to ensure that Americans are treated equally and justly. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 7:38 am by Mark Graber
The United States is better thought of as in the fourth or fifth decade of a dysfunctional constitutional order than as either experiencing the painfully slow transition from the Reagan Era to something else (Jack Balkin’s view) or the collapse of the constitutional order of 1787 (Sandy Levinson’s view). [read post]