Search for: "Sandy Levinson"
Results 381 - 400
of 584
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2010, 7:08 pm
Some people, like Sandy Levinson, argue that this is because those states have dysfunctional constitutions. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 5:34 am
" (H/T and commentary: Sandy Levinson). [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 3:43 pm
It risks being a temptation to a sort of judicial deus ex machina to which we are drawn increasingly because we find ourselves flummoxed by the deeply-rooted holdups that characterize our mature (or, perhaps, to draw on Sandy Levinson and Richard Posner, our aging and increasingly rigid and sclerotic) constitutional structure. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 6:49 am
Sandy Levinson has supplied an energetic critique of the features of our government that are “hard-wired” into the Constitution. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 10:33 pm
Balkin characterizes the Federal Reserve as an example what Sandy Levinson and he “call distributed dictatorship. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 3:05 am
Nice.In our recent essay on constitutional dictatorship Sandy Levinson and I offer Bernanke as an example of a distinctive and important feature of American government, what we call distributed dictatorship. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 9:43 am
Maybe Sandy Levinson himself comes close, but I don't think even he is a pure Cassandra pessimist. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:15 am
His misdiagnosis also seems to influence Sandy Levinson’s unduly pessimistic view of the chances for reform. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 7:00 pm
(Ilya Somin) In a post commenting on the controversy generated by our earlier exchange (see here and here), Sandy Levinson writes: It is obvious that contemporary libertarians are prone to blame individuals for most (even if .... not all) things that befall them; political liberals are far more likely to offer structuralist explanations that have the consequence of exempting individuals from “responsibility” for much of their fate. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 3:12 pm
TRAPPED MINERS, LIBERTARIANISM, AND a response to Sandy Levinson. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 1:05 am
Sandy Levinson is a leading constitutional law scholar, and his work on the issues where he is an expert is almost always insightful and interesting. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 7:18 am
As Sandy Levinson has argued on this blog and in his book, we need to take a more critical stancein examining how the Constitution is connected with what has gone wrong in politics and policy. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 7:30 am
The contributors will be Stephen Gardbaum of UCLA, Sandy Levinson of Texas, and Stephen Griffin of Tulane. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 2:37 pm
As readers of this blog know, co-blogger Sandy Levinson believes that our national political institutions are broken and the Constitution is largely to blame. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 11:45 am
Update, October 5: As I say, I was only channeling Sandy Levinson on this one. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 1:24 pm
This is Sandy Levinson's and my notion of partisan entrenchment.If Rick is right that modern Presidents cannot easily punish the Supreme Court directly, how is it, he asks, that the Supreme Court can be more or less guaranteed to stay in touch with the values of the dominant national coalition? [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 8:27 am
My former colleague Sandy Levinson (Texas) comments. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 8:55 am
Sandy Levinson is perhaps the greatest intellectual value investor in the American legal academy. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 4:30 am
My former colleague Sandy Levinson has the details. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 6:18 am
In a post at Balkinization discussing when filibusters are justified, Sandy Levinson offers a critique of Senator Lindsey Graham’s explanation for why he will vote to confirm Elena Kagan. [read post]
