Search for: "Sandy Levinson" Results 461 - 480 of 580
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2008, 6:34 pm
Over at Balkanization, Sandy Levinson has some great posts about "constitutional minefields" in existing presidential (and vice presidential) selection processes that may not be able to handle (or handle in a democratically legitimate way) some unlikely-but-not-impossible contingencies in this election. [read post]
31 Aug 2008, 7:19 pm
Sandy Levinson and others have, in recent years, been calling attention to what they regard as the Constitution's failures. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 8:45 pm
Over at Balkinization, Sandy Levinson laments the comments of Matthew Bryza, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs, who is quoted as as saying that "[Georgian accession to NATO] is what is going to happen now. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 7:32 pm
We read Stanley Fish's The Law Wishes to Have a Formal Existence and Sandy Levinson's Law as Literature. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 1:49 pm
o Sanford Levinson and Jack Balkin - Morton Horwitz and The Rule of Lawo Laura Kalman - Transformationso Bill Nelson - Who Should Judge Legal History: Lawyers or Historians? [read post]
20 Jul 2008, 9:53 am
Sandy Levinson has this to say on the book jacket: Cindy Skach's book on Weimar Germany and the French Fifth Republic is a treasure trove of insights not only about the politics of these two countries, [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 6:49 am
In conversation Sandy Levinson has impressed on me several curious features of the Second Amendment right of self-defense recently recognized in District of Columbia v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 6:00 am by Doug Kmiec
  Jack Balkin and Sandy Levinson are right to probe with hypothetical the dimensions of the newly-minted, or perhaps ancient, right of self-defense, or right to own handguns, in one's home, or maybe outside it, or maybe also to own other weaponry, or maybe not, so firmly established in District of Columbia v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 4:01 am by Jack Balkin
Inconversation Sandy Levinson has impressed on me several curiousfeatures of the Second Amendment right of self-defense recentlyrecognized in District of Columbia v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 4:01 am by Jack Balkin
In conversation Sandy Levinson has impressed on me several curious features of the Second Amendment right of self-defense recently recognized in District of Columbia v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 9:29 pm
I see these new notable new Heller posts from around the law professor blogosphere: At Balkinization from Sandy Levinson, Does the Constitution protect a substantive right to hunt? [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 4:06 pm
Sandy Levinson at Balkinizationsays no, and suggests we are living in "parallel universes. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 1:32 pm
That they do is the central claim of Sandy Levinson's and my theory of partisan entrenchment. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 9:05 am
That they do is the central claim of Sandy Levinson's and my theory of partisan entrenchment. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 6:32 am by Jack Balkin
That they do is the central claim of Sandy Levinson's and my theory of partisan entrenchment . [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 8:02 pm
Jack RakovePicking up on Sandy Levinson's and Mark Tushnet's recent postings, and drawing on my own working life as a "real historian" with more than a passing interest in originalism, I asked the other Jack to add a posting of my own on Heller. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 5:40 pm
Sandy Levinson raises this interesting issue: One of the valuable points made in Saul Cornell's book on the Second Amendment is that self-defense was treated as a "common-law" right and not a "constitutional right" at the time of the Framing. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 1:30 pm
Over at Balkinization, Sandy Levinson offers his initial thoughts on the decision here. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 1:03 pm
SANDY LEVINSON: Some Preliminary Reflections on Heller. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 9:57 am
The first elaborates on a point Sandy Levinson made. [read post]