Search for: "Sandy Levinson" Results 521 - 540 of 580
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2012, 9:28 am by Kiran Bhat
Cato@Liberty, David Koppel of the Volokh Conspiracy, and Jack Balkin, Neil Siegel, and Sandy Levinson at Balkinzation, all offer thoughts on a “limiting principle” for congressional power. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 1:02 pm by Paul Horwitz
 I don't see this as either a good or bad thing--unless, I suppose, like Sandy Levinson, one has given up on the American Constitution itself and is looking for some fresh drafting advice. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:06 am by Kiran Bhat
” Peter Wallsten and Robert Barnes of the Washington Post, Brooks Jackson of FactCheck.org (via USA Today), and Mike Sacks of the Huffington Post also have coverage of the President’s remarks, while Sandy Levinson has commentary at Balkinization. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:07 pm by Ilya Somin
Outside the judiciary, leading liberal constitutional law scholars such as Akhil Amar, Jack Balkin, and Sandy Levinson have defended the idea that the Second Amendment protects an important individual right enforceable against all levels of government. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 10:21 am
  Sandy Levinson asked When does a political/economic crisis become a constitutional one? [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization symposium on Martin Loughlin,  Against Constitutionalism (Harvard University Press, 2022).Martin Loughlin Since one purpose in publishing Against Constitutionalism (AC) with Harvard was to maximise the chance of it being read by American constitutional scholars, I cannot be other than delighted with the reviews. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
This post was prepared for a roundtable onComparative Constitutional Design, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
  Consider Sandy Levinson’s vital distinction between the Constitution of Conversation and Constitution of Settlement. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the symposium on Lawrence Lessig, Fidelity and Constraint: How the Supreme Court Has Read the American Constitution (Oxford University Press, 2019).Ryan D. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 4:29 pm by Lawrence Solum
IntroductionThe counter-majoritarian difficulty may be the best known problem in constitutional theory. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 9:50 am
  One last above-the-fold note:  Sandy Levinson recently wrote something quite interesting on Balkinization, on whether a former card-carrying member of the Conference on Critical Legal Studies can criticize the Bush administration for not respecting the rule of law. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 1:42 pm by Lawrence Solum
Introduction The counter-majoritarian difficulty may be the best known problem in constitutional theory. [read post]
22 May 2011, 2:36 pm by Lawrence Solum
Introduction The counter-majoritarian difficulty may be the best known problem in constitutional theory. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 5:00 am by Joseph Fishkin
Sandy Levinson has long been sounding the alarm about the constitutional mechanisms, beginning with the structure of the U.S. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  In its wake we have the welcome work of people like David, Sandy Levinson, Mark Graber, John Mikhail, Eric Lomazoff, and others too numerous to mention (and to whom I apologize for not doing so) giving those of us with much to learn the insights and raw material required to fill in and reshape our assumptions about the case and its importance. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Fetishizing obscure bits of text with methods inaccessible to ordinary citizens makes the problem much worse, and lends what is already a juristocracy a quasi-religious sort of authority whose fundamentally antidemocratic nature Sandy Levinson has fruitfully explored. [read post]