Search for: "Sandy Levinson" Results 61 - 80 of 562
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2007, 5:59 am
Sandy Levinson and I will be providing comments today at Georgetown at Noon on Louis Michael Seidman's new book, Silence and Freedom. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 4:01 am by Jack Balkin
In conversation Sandy Levinson has impressed on me several curious features of the Second Amendment right of self-defense recently recognized in District of Columbia v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 4:50 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Michael Greve's got a new book out, The Upside-Down Constitution , and Sandy Levinson's review makes it sound highly relevant to my debates with the crowd that wants to federalize corporate law:... [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 6:40 pm
And also at that blog, Sandy Levinson has a post titled "Stephen A. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 7:12 pm
In posts of interest at "Balkinization": Sandy Levinson has a post titled "John Roberts on judicial doctrine. [read post]
29 May 2012, 3:33 pm by constitutional lawblogger
As ConLawProf Sandy Levinson rightly observes in an Op-Ed in today's NYT, "the Constitution is enveloped in near religious veneration. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 1:09 pm by Gerard N. Magliocca
I would like to note that the Indiana Law Review will hold its Annual Symposium on Friday on "Partisan Conflict, Political Structure, and Culture" with speakers including our own Jack Balkin, Mark Graber, and Sandy Levinson. [read post]
3 Sep 2007, 9:09 am
Larry Solum has live-blogged the APSA panel on the "New Originalism," featuring Sandy Levinson, Jack Balkin, Keith Whittington, Sot Barber, Jim Fleming, and our own Randy Barnett. [read post]
23 Nov 2006, 12:59 am
I don't usually agree with Sandy Levinson, but his post on this important subject is an exception. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 8:00 pm
Sandy Levinson of UT Law has, John Roberts on judicial doctrine, at Balkinization.In a sharply... [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 7:24 pm by
And Sandy Levinson blogs on judicial elections generally, including Wisconsin.... [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 4:01 am by Jack Balkin
Inconversation Sandy Levinson has impressed on me several curiousfeatures of the Second Amendment right of self-defense recentlyrecognized in District of Columbia v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 9:19 am by Steven D. Schwinn
The debate will feature Alan Dershowitz and Sandy Levinson (arguing yes) and David Kopel and Eugene... [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 5:15 pm
Sandy Levinson writes at Balkinization: I note that both Virginia and Montana have third party candidates for the Senate who have won enough votes possibly to affect the election. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Joseph Blocher  In 1989, Sandy Levinson published “The Embarrassing Second Amendment”in the Yale Law Journal. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Law, Literature, and Other Performing Arts, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
16 May 2018, 6:04 am by Paul Horwitz
" I liked Sandy Levinson and Mark Graber's recent article, The Constitutional Powers of Anti-Publian Presidents: Constitutional Interpretation in a Broken Constitutional Order, lots. [read post]
24 Dec 2007, 9:25 am
We are all indebted to Sandy Levinson, not only for his wonderful book on fixing American constitutionalism, but also for his extraordinary career as a public intellectual and as a patriot who always gives his best to America. [read post]
19 May 2011, 5:20 pm by Jason Mazzone
My distinguished colleague-in-blogging, Sandy Levinson, says about my earlier post on the Goodwin Liu vote today that I'm wrong.I'm not ready to agree with that.Professor Levinson says 52 votes on cloture don't approach a negative vote on the merits and he complains of the "tyranny of the egregious Senate minority" that killed the Liu nomination. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 5:11 am by Mark Graber
 My friend Sandy Levinson, who should be dancing in the streets after Alito’s comments, makes similar observations when repeatedly insisting that only a lunatic could support government by a constitution rooted in the peculiar conditions of late eighteenth century and mid-nineteenth century politics that have limited, if not perverse, relevance for political conditions in the first decades of the twenty-first century. [read post]