Search for: "Sandy Levinson"
Results 121 - 140
of 547
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2007, 8:54 am
I just read an interesting post by Sandy Levinson on the blog, Balkinization on Nativism and the American Right. [read post]
18 May 2011, 1:06 pm
Thank you Sandy Levinson! [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 6:32 am
That they do is the central claim of Sandy Levinson's and my theory of partisan entrenchment . [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 1:32 pm
That they do is the central claim of Sandy Levinson's and my theory of partisan entrenchment. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 11:35 pm
At the LSA, I attended the "Many Faces of Constitutionalism" panel, for which Sandy Levinson was the chair/discussant. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 5:18 am
Sandy's essay is here.It's worth noting that the choice was not necessarily between the three-fifths clause or no constitution at all. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 3:51 am
Sandy Levinson and I are about to go to Baltimore today for an annual gathering of political scientists and law professors interested in constitutional law, affectionately called the "Schmooze. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
As Sandy Levinson's posts (including the most recent) have suggested, when we think about the current administration and the Supreme Court, our thoughts almost inevitably turn to the mid-1930s. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 5:09 pm
This is the title of Sandy Levinson's post, over at Balkinization, reacting to (the New York Times' account and characterization of) Pope Benedict XVI's recent dealings with several formerly-schismatic Catholic bishops, including one who is clearly a loathesome Holocaust denier. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 7:30 am
Samuel Levine It is both a pleasure and an honor to participate in this fitting tribute to Sandy Levinson. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 10:36 am
“Our inevitably living Constitution”: Sandy Levinson has this post at the “Balkinization” blog. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 7:03 pm
... with UT lawprof Sanford Levinson: (I'm just starting to listen. [read post]
8 May 2008, 10:03 pm
For example, see the posts of Brian Tamanaha and Sandy Levinson. [read post]
19 May 2007, 2:17 am
Sandy Levinson and I have suggested that the next President, whether Democrat or Republican, will probably continue elements of what we call the National Surveillance State, which will continues to shift increasing amounts of power to the Executive in order to gather and analyze information believed necessary to promote National Security. [read post]
5 Sep 2006, 4:28 pm
Readers of Balkinization (and numerous academic listservs) will no doubt be familiar with Professor Sandy Levinson's frequent phillipics against the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
The book extends Lessig's theory of constitutional fidelity as translation to argue that the Supreme Court has, over its history, balanced the obligation of fidelity to meaning with the obligation of fidelity to the judicial role.We have assembled a terrific group of commentators, including Pamela Brandwein (Michigan), Ryan Doerfler (Chicago), Mark Graber (Maryland), Sandy Levinson (Texas), Gerard Magliocca (Indiana), John Mikhail (Georgetown), and Larry Solum (Georgetown)At… [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 1:30 pm
Sandy Levinson, JFK and the President as the “Decider”.4. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 6:00 am
This week at Balkinization we are hosting a symposium on Kurt Lash's new two volume collection, The Reconstruction Amendments: The Essential Documents (University of Chicago Press, 2021)(2 vols.).We have assembled a terrific group of commentators, including Christopher Green (Mississippi), Sandy Levinson (Texas), Gerard Magliocca (Indiana), Jennifer Mascot (George Mason), Darrell Miller (Duke), Richard Primus (Michigan), Bradley Rebeiro (BYU), Lee Strang (Toledo),… [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 6:00 am
Sandy Levinson: An Essential Book: Linda Colley,on the origins of written constitutionalism.5. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 6:00 am
.), Guha Krishnamurthi (Oklahoma), Sandy Levinson (Texas), Serena Mayeri (Penn), Doug NeJaime (Yale), Reva Siegel (Yale), and Ilan Wurman (Arizona State).At the conclusion, Jim will respond to the commentators. [read post]
