Search for: "Sandy Levinson"
Results 161 - 180
of 555
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
Sandy Levinson, Partisan Divisions in the Supreme Court: It's Likely to Get Worse (and There's No Reason to Think that it Will Necessarily Ever Get Better)8. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 5:00 am
We also discuss important differences between the more ideological Republican party and the more constituent-driven Democratic party; these differences are critical in understanding Reagan Attorney General Ed Meese’s transformative role in shaping legal policy through his embrace of the then-fledgling Federalist Society (an observation that is prominently featured in Sandy Levinson’s and Jack Balkin’s posts). [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 1:02 pm
In an otherwise terrific book by Justin Driver and in a recent post by Sandy Levinson over at Balkinization (where I also blog), the false story that Justice McReynolds refused to sit next to Justice Brandeis one year for the Court's official photograph was repeated. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
For the symposium on Neal Devins and Lawrence Baum's new book, The Company They Keep: How Partisan Divisions Came to the Supreme Court (Oxford University Press, 2019).Devins and Baum's The Company They Keep is a fine book that nevertheless manages to bury the lede. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 5:30 am
Irvine), Sandy Levinson (Texas), Frank Pasquale (Maryland), Rick Pildes (NYU), John McGinnis (Northwestern), and myself.At the conclusion, Neal and Larry will respond to the commentators. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 2:34 pm
You should note as well that one of the panels is honoring the collective work of our colleague Gary Jacobsohn, a truly major figure in the field of comparative constitutional law.The entire program follows: The Future of Liberal… [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 2:22 pm
I woke up yesterday and saw a New York Times news alert on my phone. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 8:00 am
This subject is complex—not least because, as Sandy Levinson appropriately writes, fixity is “chimerical. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 8:15 am
(We never want to be too reductive, but Levinson’s invocation of “motivated reasoning” certainly seems relevant here.) [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 10:36 am
“Our inevitably living Constitution”: Sandy Levinson has this post at the “Balkinization” blog. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
Framers designing a constitution must decide between provisions likely capable of only one interpretation that will become part of what Sandy Levinson calls the Constitution of Settlement or provisions whose interpretation will be disputed that will become part of what Sandy Levinson calls the Constitution of Conversation. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 5:00 am
Sandy Levinson has long been sounding the alarm about the constitutional mechanisms, beginning with the structure of the U.S. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 7:50 am
Among American legal scholars, Sandy Levinson has seen the future. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 6:22 am
Last fall, Sandy Levinson, Mark Tushnet and I asked thirty-five of the leading experts on constitutionalism to consider the state of constitutional democracy with respect to particular countries, regions and problems. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 10:25 am
A few days ago, Professor Sandy Levinson argued on this blog that to believe the ERA would pass, one would have to believe Congress has no power to set time limits for amendments and that states cannot rescind their ratifications. [read post]
29 May 2018, 8:28 am
This clause is—one might have thought—part of what Sandy Levinson calls the hard-wired constitution of settlement. [read post]
18 May 2018, 7:42 am
” Sandy Levinson has this post at the “Balkinization” blog. [read post]
16 May 2018, 6:04 am
" I liked Sandy Levinson and Mark Graber's recent article, The Constitutional Powers of Anti-Publian Presidents: Constitutional Interpretation in a Broken Constitutional Order, lots. [read post]
7 May 2018, 7:09 am
Neily III Of course, there are numerous other excellent and influential books I might have mentioned by such well-known authors as John Hart Ely, Ronald Dworkin, Akhil Amar, James Ely, Bruce Ackerman, Richard Epstein, Barry Friedman, Richard Fallon, David Strauss, Jack Balkin, Sandy Levinson, James Fleming, Tom West and many more. [read post]
3 May 2018, 6:34 pm
That is how I began my talk at the New England Political Science Association’s Annual Meeting on the paper Sandy Levinson and I wrote that was just published by the Chapman Law Review: “The Constitutional Powers of Anti-Publian Presidents: Constitutional Interpretation in a Broken Constitutional Order. [read post]
