Search for: "Sanford Levinson" Results 301 - 320 of 374
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2020, 1:27 pm by Ilya Somin
There are pieces by Jack Balkin, Sanford Levinson, Michael Lind, Cynthia Nicoletti, and Robert Tsai. [read post]
20 May 2007, 8:56 am
Balkin writes: Both we [Balkin and his co-theorist Sanford Levinson] and Ackerman agree that if the public keeps returning a party to the White House, eventually this will result in changes in constitutional doctrine. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 7:09 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
In his contribution to the 2012 Alexander Bickel Symposium, organized on the occasion of the 50th anniversary of the publication of The Least Dangerous Branch, Professor Sanford Levinson wrote: “…what one finds among all of the Justices, whatever may be their disagreements on the substantive issues, is a remarkable insouciance regarding the Bickelian ‘passive virtues. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 8:40 am by Randy E. Barnett
I have assigned 71 books by 68 authors, with books by Sandy Levinson, Gerard Magliocca and Dan Farber making 2 appearances. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:20 pm
Before I tell you why I think so, let me excerpt part of a fascinating discussion that was held by Law Professors Sanford Levinson and Jack Balkin on just that issue: As already suggested, though, my concerns about Roe, and whether the Democratic Party should continue to expend a great deal of political capital on keeping it on the books, have less to do with specifically legal concerns--i.e., what constitutes the best interpretation of the Constitution? [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 2:29 pm by Randy E. Barnett
Since 2005, I have assigned 85 books by 79 authors, with Sandy Levinson, Gerard Magliocca, Eric Segall, Dan Farber, Philip Hamburger, and David Bernstein each making 2 appearances. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 5:11 am by Gerard Magliocca
United States,[12] which is considered the critical moment of 1935 by most scholars.[13] The resolution of the monetary question in favor of devaluation deprived the President’s populist critics of vital ammunition and allowed the country to avoid a repeat of the 1896 presidential campaign between William Jennings Bryan and William McKinley.[14] What makes Perry especially fascinating is that the decision presented two branches of government with tough dilemmas at the same time.[15] In a… [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Wrestling with Religious Diversity, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Aziz Rana  Sanford Levinson’s scholarship has long been a central influence on my own work. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Sanford Levinson This post was prepared for a roundtable on Civic Education, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022. [read post]
24 May 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Sanford Levinson This post was prepared for a roundtable on Public Memory and Public Monuments, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization symposium on Christian G. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Sanford Levinson This post was prepared for a roundtable on Wrestling with Religious Diversity, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
For the symposium on Sanford Levinson and Jack M. [read post]
12 May 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the symposium on Sanford Levinson and Jack M. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by JB
For the symposium on Sanford Levinson and Jack M. [read post]
14 May 2019, 6:30 am by Stephen Griffin
For the symposium on Sanford Levinson and Jack M. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by JB
For the symposium on Sanford Levinson and Jack M. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 7:53 pm by Ilya Somin
I have no problem with that idea, which enjoys widespread (though certainly not universal) support from legal scholars on different sides of the political spectrum, such as Sanford Levinson on the left, and Steve Calabresi on the right. [read post]