Search for: "Sanford Levinson"
Results 321 - 340
of 374
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2008, 7:11 am
Part IV provides a case study in constitutional possibility by examining Sanford Levinson's proposal for a constitutional convention. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 6:13 am
Fleming, Securing Constitutional Democracy (2006)Mark Graber, Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil (2006)Sanford Levinson, Our Undemocratic Constitution (2006)Walter F. [read post]
26 Apr 2008, 10:02 am
Fleming, Securing Constitutional Democracy (2006)Mark Graber, Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil (2006)Sanford Levinson, Our Undemocratic Constitution (2006)Walter F. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 5:47 am
Sanford Levinson, who believes the Second Amendment provides a right to individual gun ownership, says the government's new position might be easier for the court to adopt. [read post]
16 Feb 2008, 9:05 pm
"--Sanford Levinson, author of Our Undemocratic Constitution: Where the Constitution Goes Wrong (and How We the People Can Correct It)"Michael Gerhardt's sophisticated and subtle book is the definitive treatment of how precedent really works in constitutional law. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 2:46 am
.' ' Sanford Levinson, a liberal University of Texas constitutional scholar who believes the Second Amendment protects individual rights, called the Bush position 'a gift to the Democratic Party' and urged his party's presidential candidates to embrace it. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 7:10 am
Estrich, Sanford Levinson, Michael W. [read post]
24 Dec 2007, 9:25 am
Last Friday evening, Bill Moyers interviewed Sanford Levinson, one of the most creative, provocative, and influential constitutional scholars of his generation. [read post]
16 Dec 2007, 7:59 am
See Glenn Greenwald’s The Lawless Surveillance State See also Jack Balkin and Sanford Levinson in their paper The Processes of Constitutional Change: From Partisan Entrenchment to the National Surveillance State [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 12:40 pm
On this view, the apparently supportive views of "liberal academics" -- including Sanford Levinson, Akhil Amar, Lawrence Tribe -- have been crucial in legitimating the individual rights position. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 6:17 am
Professors Jack Balkin (Yale) and Sanford Levinson (U of Texas) have posted "Law and the Humanities: An Uneasy Relationship" (Yale Law School, Public Law Working Paper No. 121; U of Texas Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 109, Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities Vol. 18, p. 155, 2006) on SSRN. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 6:06 am
Both Rich and Khare also note the classic weaknesses of liberal constitutionalism - that it is prone to being misguided by populism, and that it relies too much on the hope that the sense of outrage of the masses will result in corrective action (which, in some cases, results in overly delayed and tame responses).In a blog post reacting to Rich's piece, American constitutional scholar Sanford Levinson argues that Rich, like other commentators, fails to ask the more fundamental… [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 5:59 am
Over the past several years, constitutional scholars Larry Sabato, Sanford Levinson, and Richard E. [read post]
16 Sep 2007, 11:20 pm
Tamanaha, Sanford Levinson, Robert F. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 7:50 am
Sanford Levinson of the University of Texas Law School asserted in a recent book, is open to debate. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 5:52 am
Greenhouse cites several books and articles, including UT law professor Sanford Levinson's "Our Undemocratic Constitution". [read post]
22 Jul 2007, 5:24 am
Balkin and Sanford Levinson. [read post]
23 Jun 2007, 3:18 pm
And from the blurbs:"An absolutely superb presentation of a "Dworkinian" approach to constitutional interpretation" -Sanford Levinson, W. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 10:48 am
Professor Balkin's impressive article correctly sees the United States Constitution as the central icon in a civic religion capable of evoking redemptive action by its citizens -- Sanford Levinson's constitutional faith. [read post]
20 May 2007, 8:56 am
Balkin writes: Both we [Balkin and his co-theorist Sanford Levinson] and Ackerman agree that if the public keeps returning a party to the White House, eventually this will result in changes in constitutional doctrine. [read post]
