Search for: "Santa Barbara County Water Agency v. All Persons & Parties" Results 1 - 4 of 4
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Filtering The CEQA Noise: First District Upholds Santa Rosa’s Negative Declaration For “Dream Center” Youth Housing Project, Holds Non-Expert Predictions Of Significant Noise Impacts Failed To Raise “Fair Argument” Supported By Substantial Evidence
4 Jun 2018, 12:10 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Amador Water Agency (2004) 116 Cal.App.4th 1099, 1108-1109; CEQA Guidelines, § 15064.7(a).) [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
2013 CEQA 2ND QUARTER REVIEW
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am by Abbott & Kindermann
According to a new decision, CEQA does not preclude all agency involvement or that of elected officials. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
Material Breach Of Contract Term No Matter How Harsh May Be Enforceable
2 Jun 2010, 6:15 am by Steven Peck
Miracle Star also refused to make available all program records pertaining to the COLA contract. 6. [read post]
California Injury Attorney Blog - http://www.california-injury-attorney-blog.com/
CEQA: 2009 Year in Review
16 Dec 2009, 8:53 am by Abbott & Kindermann
EIRs Piecemealing Castaic Water Agency did not improperly piecemeal by preparing and EIR for transfer of water from Kern County Water Agency to Castaic Water Agency that was separate from the EIR. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/