Search for: "Santiago v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 348
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2021, 4:55 am
The US Supreme Court on Tuesday heard oral arguments in HollyFrontier Cheyenne Refining, LLC v Renewable Fuels Association, a case regarding exemptions for small refineries from the Renewable Fuel Standards Program, and United States v Palomar-Santiago, which involves immigration law and noncitizen re-entry. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 9:00 am
Earlier this week the Eleventh Circuit issued a published decision in Pinares v. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 8:54 pm
Relying on Santiago v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 12:04 pm
NATIVIDAD SANTIAGO; BETSY SANTIAGO; and MAZIE, SLATER, KATZ and FREEMAN, LLC, App. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 4:39 am
State v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 1:44 am
Santiago. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 1:33 pm
State v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 5:49 am
AC33912 - State v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:45 am
AC34001 - State v. [read post]
6 May 2021, 6:41 am
Palomar-Santiago Mahanoy Area School District v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 4:33 pm
In United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 5:31 am
Specifically the essays explore whether a sovereign wealth find can form itself to the ideals expressed in emerging regulatory regimes, like the Santiago Principles, one based on the idea that states may be treated like private entities with respect to their enterprises, formally sovereign but functionally private, as long as they conform to a set of behavior expectations which are said to distinguish sovereign from private behavior. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 5:14 am
State v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 6:22 pm
Matter of McGillicuddy’s Tap House, Ltd. v New York State Liquor Authority This Article 78 proceeding was brought about to review a determination of the New York State Liquor Authority finding petitioner McGillicuddy’s Tap House in violation of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 12:27 pm
Vega-Santiago, No. 06-1558 (1st Cir. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 5:49 am
") SC17413 Concurrence - State v. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 5:30 am
United States, 94 US 97 (1876) (“fugitive disentitlement doctrine”). [read post]
17 May 2013, 1:27 pm
(Indian Child Welfare Act, active efforts)Santiago v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 1:03 pm
For example, in the 1987 case Santiago v. [read post]
25 May 2021, 8:26 am
In United States v. [read post]
