Search for: "Santiago v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 312
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2007, 10:11 am
Vega-Santiago, No. 06-1558. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 12:50 am
Monday, in United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 7:27 pm
Thus, the New York Court of Appeals has accordingly concluded that, in appropriate cases, experts should be allowed to inform juries about research findings regarding many of the factors affecting the accuracy of eyewitness memory (see People v LeGrand, 8 NY3d 449, 452 [2007]; People v Santiago, 17 NY3d 661 [2011]; People v Abney, 13 NY3d 251, 267 [2011]). [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 7:27 pm
Thus, the New York Court of Appeals has accordingly concluded that, in appropriate cases, experts should be allowed to inform juries about research findings regarding many of the factors affecting the accuracy of eyewitness memory (see People v LeGrand, 8 NY3d 449, 452 [2007]; People v Santiago, 17 NY3d 661 [2011]; People v Abney, 13 NY3d 251, 267 [2011]). [read post]
21 May 2014, 6:54 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 12:12 pm
Ultimately, this failure to diagnose her lung cancer resulted in her death in 2017, according to her adult children’s position in Santiago v. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 12:12 pm
Ultimately, this failure to diagnose her lung cancer resulted in her death in 2017, according to her adult children’s position in Santiago v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 11:07 am
Santiago- Davila, 26 M.J. 380 (C.A.A.F. 1988), applying Batson v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 5:03 pm
Bailey v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 4:54 am
Relying on Santiago v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 7:13 pm
In United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 4:49 pm
(Editor’s Note: This post is based on a client memorandum by Adam Emmerich, Mark Gordon, Sabastian V. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 6:56 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 6:50 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Criminal Opinions Body: SC17413 - State v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 1:00 am
It apparently befuddled ASA Santiago Aroco who handled the case for the State. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 5:47 am
State v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 1:42 pm
On Tuesday, the justices will hear arguments in United States v. [read post]
Implied consent is valid, and the need for advice as to consequences serves a purpose beyond consent
2 May 2008, 12:26 pm
Santiago v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 2:00 pm
Because the art market is opaque, diligence is needed to discover an object's true chain of custody, transfer, and ownership.The latest court case demonstrating the need for due diligence is United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:51 am
United States v. [read post]
