Search for: "Santiago v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 343
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2010, 11:12 am by Marx Sterbcow
Mortgage, 520 F.3d 1289, 1291 (11th Cir. 2008) (holding that “subsection 8(b) does not apply to settlement fees that are alleged to be excessive”); Santiago v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
  The United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts denied ALS’s motion to vacate, finding that manifest disregard of the law was no longer a basis for vacating or modifying arbitration awards in light of Hall Street and the First Circuit’s recent decision in Ramos-Santiago v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 6:38 am by Keith Paul Bishop
  Since 1998, he has served as a member of the Board of Trustees of the Rancho Santiago Community College District. [read post]
23 May 2010, 8:10 pm by Santiago J. Padilla
If you have questions regarding the Fair Labor Standards Act or other employment laws, contact the Law Offices of Santiago J. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:00 pm
(D.Mass. 1992) 794 F.Supp. 29) and affirmed Santiago v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 7:31 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Santiago-Vélez, aka “Cabestro” and “El Gordo,” and Erick Santiago-Vélez, aka “Catote” and “Gargola”; and their mother and owner of the Percocet and Xanax distribution point, Carmen A. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 10:52 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
"We will continue to investigate and prosecute those who engage in corrupt acts which directly affect federal programs and the availability of these funds for its intended recipients," stated Rodríguez-Vélez. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 10:52 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
"We will continue to investigate and prosecute those who engage in corrupt acts which directly affect federal programs and the availability of these funds for its intended recipients," stated Rodríguez-Vélez. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 2:06 pm by Erin E. Dardis
”  The Fifth District reversed the order of the trial court compelling binding arbitration per the arbitration agreement at issue, and certified conflict with Santiago v. [read post]