Search for: "Sarah Turberville"
Results 1 - 7
of 7
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2020, 5:54 am
“Sexual harassment by judges operating with impunity shows courts need their own #MeToo; The branch of government charged with enforcing federal discrimination and harassment laws does not police its own”: Dylan Hedtler-Gaudette and Sarah Turberville recently had this essay online at NBC News. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 7:47 am
Sarah E. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 5:16 am
Here’s the Tuesday morning read: Supreme Court split on whether the Sackler family can be sued over opioid crisis (John Fritze, USA Today) One Supreme Court Case Could Mess Up Chunks of the Tax Code (Richard Rubin & Jess Bravin, The Wall Street Journal) Switchblade Ban Stymies Judges Grappling With Right to Bear Arms (Allie Reed, Bloomberg Law) Clarence Thomas’ Benefactors Finally Face the Music (David Janovsky & Sarah Turberville, Slate) Two new Supreme Court… [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 2:39 pm
Last Monday, former public defender Sarah Turberville with the Project on Government Oversight and former prosecutor Lars Trautman with the R Street Institute penned an op-ed for The Hill in response to the Justice Department’s decision and how it’s a step backwards in what should be the government’s obligation to ensure everyone’s constitutional right to legal counsel and seek justice. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 6:32 am
In an op-ed for The Hill, Sarah Turberville and Anthony Marcum criticize proposals for court packing, which, they argue, “does not address the core grievance of disenfranchisement and would instead accelerate the politicization of the Supreme Court. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 4:36 am
At POGO, Sarah Turberville urges the justices to review a case in which “[a] man on death row in Arkansas, Don Davis, [is asking] the Supreme Court to end the state’s practice of requiring the defense and prosecution to share the same state mental health professional in death penalty cases. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 6:15 am
” “‘It certainly seems emblematic of the broader problem of there not being a specific and descriptive code of conduct that the justices need to follow that’s enforceable in any way,’ Sarah Turberville, the director of The Constitution Project, said in an interview. [read post]
