Search for: "Saucier v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 79
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2008, 7:05 am
. __________________ Docket: 07-608 Case name: United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 7:45 am
For example, see Saucier v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 1:55 pm
” Saucier v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 3:06 am
Back in 2001, in Saucier v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 1:50 am
Thomas Colby has posted an article titled "Clearing the Smoke from Philip Morris v. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 4:00 am
Saucier v. [read post]
15 May 2020, 10:11 am
Credit: Reuters In the United States, police violence frequently dominates the news cycle. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 12:30 am
” Saucier v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 11:19 am
Callahan, No. 07-751 In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action against state law enforcement officers who conducted a warrantless search of plaintiff's house incident to his arrest for the sale of methamphetamine to an undercover informant (whom plaintiff had voluntarily admitted to the premises), a court of appeals ruling reversing a ruling that defendants were entitled to qualified immunity is reversed where: 1) the procedure the Supreme Court mandated in Saucier v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
Callahan (07-751), on whether police officers were entitled to qualified immunity for conducting a warrantless search based on the signal of an undercover informant who had previously entered the home, and whether the Court should overrule its decision in Saucier v. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
Sarausad (07-772), on whether, during habeas review, federal courts must accept state court determinations that jury instructions correctly explain state law regarding accomplice liability; and Hedgpeth v. [read post]
26 Aug 2007, 2:22 pm
" United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 11:18 am
Rutherford, 272 F.3d 1272, 1285 (9th Cir. 2001),(quoting Saucier, 533 U.S. at 202). [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 8:04 am
The mandatory sequence was laid down in Saucier v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 11:30 am
Callahan, No. 07-751 In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action against state law enforcement officers who conducted a warrantless search of plaintiff's house incident to his arrest for the sale of methamphetamine to an undercover informant (whom plaintiff had voluntarily admitted to the premises), a court of appeals ruling reversing a ruling that defendants were entitled to qualified immunity is reversed where: 1) the procedure the Supreme Court mandated in Saucier v. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 6:24 am
Saucier v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Virginia State v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 11:00 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 11:17 am
S596aCivil rights -- Search and seizure -- Qualified immunity -- Under two-step procedure for resolving government officials' qualified immunity claims mandated by Court in Saucier v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 11:19 am
That is the "Saucier" formula, spelled out in Saucier v. [read post]
