Search for: "Saul Cornell" Results 121 - 140 of 171
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2013, 8:21 am by Alfred Brophy
Saul Cornell and Nathan Kozuskanich's edited volume, The Second Amendment on Trial: Critical Essays on District of Columbia v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 8:31 am
Here is the abstract.In a article examining the “myths and realities about early American gun regulation,” Saul Cornell provides new insight as to how the right to arms outside the home evolved in Antebellum law. [read post]
1 May 2013, 3:32 pm by Alfred Brophy
Fordham University history professor Saul Cornell, George Mason University law professor Joyce Lee Malcom, and Craig Whitney, former foreign correspondent at the New York Times discuss the second amendment on the PBS show "Need to Know." [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 4:14 pm by Alfred Brophy
 Jack Balkin, Yale Law School Saul Cornell, Fordham University, History Andrew Kent, Fordham University School of Law Thomas H. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 9:47 pm by Alfred Brophy
Rev. 177 (2007); Saul Cornell, "The People's Constitution vs. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Saul Cornell's recent piece in the Daily Beast is here. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 8:12 am by Alfred Brophy
Check out Saul Cornell's piece at the Daily Beast on the history of the second amendment. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 9:06 pm by Alfred Brophy
 Saul Cornell and David Konig are two scholars who have both done a lot of work that is directly engaged in a contempoary legal issue. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 9:30 am by Mary L. Dudziak
Saul Cornell's posts on Originalism during his guest stint at Faculty Lounge are so over the top that perhaps they make this point on their own. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 8:54 am by Alfred Brophy
Following up on the guest post from earlier in the week, here's another guest post from Saul Cornell. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 10:29 am by Alfred Brophy
 Now we have a guest post by Saul Cornell, the Paul and Diane Guenther Chair in American History at Fordham University. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 10:42 am by Alfred Brophy
The ever-thoughtful Saul Cornell, who holds the Paul and Diane Guenther Chair in History at Fordham, has a new article, "The People's Constitution vs. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm by Erik Gerding
Admati, Peter Conti-Brown, & Paul Pfleiderer, Liability Holding Companies (presented by Peter Conti-Brown (Stanford), comments by Saule Omarova (North Carolina)) (my introductory blog post) Sunday: Eric Chaffee (Dayton) & Geoffrey C. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 9:36 am by Alfred Brophy
"  Among the scholars cited there are Erwin Chemerinsky, Saul Cornell, Don Fehrenbacher, Robert George, Mark Graber, Daniel Hamilton, Morton Horwitz, Daniel Hulsebosch, Frank Michelman, Chris Tomlins, Mark Tushnet, Robin West, and Gordon Wood. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 2:32 pm by Victor
Hideki Kanda & Saul Levmore, Taxes, Agency Costs, and the Price of Incorporation, 77 Va. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 7:02 am by Jon
This is a response to Saul Cornell, "Why the Right-Wing's Approach to Reading the Constitution Is Destroying This Country" -- That idea that judges should interpret the Constitution by discovering the original intent or meaning of the text ignores the history of this country's founding. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 7:02 am by Jon
This is a response to Saul Cornell, "Why the Right-Wing's Approach to Reading the Constitution Is Destroying This Country" -- That idea that judges should interpret the Constitution by discovering the original intent or meaning of the text ignores the history of this country's founding. [read post]
11 May 2011, 12:00 pm by Karen Tani
" So writes Saul Cornell (Fordham University) in a recent essay on the "new originalist" theory of constitutional interpretation: its provenance, its applications, and, in his view, its errors.Here's a taste:THERE IS something deeply ironic about new originalism that its [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 7:52 am by Saul Cornell - Guest
Saul Cornell is a professor of history at Fordham University, and signed an amicus brief in favor of the respondent city in McDonald v. [read post]