Search for: "Scales v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 5,240
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2017, 8:17 am by Adam Levitin
The Supreme Court ruled today in Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Samantha Barbas, State University of New York Buffalo Law School, has posted When Privacy Almost Won: Time, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 11:35 am
The California Supreme Court case of two juveniles caught throwing a cherry bomb at a hill that set off a large-scale brush fire was recently decided by the The People v. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 8:15 am by Aaron S. Weiss
In Bristol-Myers Squibb, the United States Supreme Court rejected California’s “sliding scale approach” to assertions of specific personal jurisdiction. [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 1:40 pm by Dennis Crouch
United States, 273 U.S. 236 (1927) and TransCore, LP v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 12:15 pm
A full-scale search was launched by air, sea, and beach by Coast Guard, local Monterey County fire departments, and California State Parks, but so far the man has not been found. [read post]
29 May 2013, 4:54 am by David DePaolo
-based American Psychiatric Association (APA), defended the new tome to WorkCompCentral, stating that the new manual moves away from the GAF because it was too easy to game.Narrow said the APA put the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule Version 2.0 (WHODAS ) in the DSM-V for review and consideration by the mental health community. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 7:00 pm by Dru Stevenson
It shifts standing away from citizen groups, and tilts the standing scale toward the AG’s office instead. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 3:15 am by ASAD KHAN
Supreme Court allows tortured Tamil asylum-seeker’s appeal KV (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2019] UKSC 10 (6 March 2019) In a recent judgment given by Lord Wilson the Supreme Court unanimously allowed KV’s appeal, remitting the matter to the UT for fresh determination. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 12:10 pm by Jason Mazzone
A principal claim of the lawsuit is that by permitting large-scale policing protests the state cannot assert that its regulations are simply based on risk-based considerations and that the state is unconstitutionally disfavoring religion. [read post]