Search for: "Scales v. United States"
Results 181 - 200
of 2,612
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2008, 10:01 pm
Nathan (right):'What we know about how states and the federal government currently execute people in the United States is deeply troubling. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:30 am
State v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 10:00 am
He had successfully resisted an extradition order sought by the United States on the grounds that price-fixing in the UK was not illegal (Norris v United States (2008) UKHL 16, (2008) 1 AC 920). [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 4:14 am
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is the federal agency responsible for approving and overseeing the distribution of vaccines in the United States. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 3:05 pm
Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 2:53 am
In Williamsburg Community Preservation Coalition v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 6:59 am
Yesterday, the Court heard arguments in United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 1:33 pm
United States, 336 U.S. 440 (1949) (holding that, in a close case, erroneously admitted evidence -- even if cumulative of other evidence -- can 'tip the scales' against the defendant) and Hawkins v. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 11:11 am
United States Dep't of the Treasury, 2011 U.S. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 9:11 am
United States, 532 U.S. 374 (2001). [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 11:23 am
The Court’s nearly unanimous decision in Bristol-Myers v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:23 pm
The United States Supreme Court today, on Wednesday June 27, 2018, reversed the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Janus v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:24 am
All plaintiffs in this case have been legally authorized to reside and work in the United States for many years. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 8:48 am
Marty Lederman says in response to my posts that the big difference between the Bush and Obama preemption doctrines was that the Bush Administration “argued that international law permits the United States to engage in a ‘first use’ strike, in a nonconsenting state, against a state or nonstate actor that has not already engaged in an armed attack against the United States, before any threat of attack is ‘fully… [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 9:03 am
Yesterday, in Kansas v. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 11:41 pm
United States decision; and 2) whether the Ninth Circuit’s decision so holding infringes upon the Supreme Court’s retained and exclusive jurisdiction over the allocation of water from the Colorado’s mainstream under the Court’s 1963 Arizona v. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 2:01 pm
The case was heard before the United States Supreme Court, and it was Brady v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 11:10 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 12:54 pm
The United States Supreme Court, the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles and Texas Gov. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 2:16 pm
In South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
