Search for: "Scales v. United States" Results 201 - 220 of 2,656
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2012, 12:54 pm by Matt Murphy
  The United States Supreme Court, the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles and Texas Gov. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 11:00 am
Toomey argued that the district court had misunderstood several important technical aspects of Upstream surveillance and, as a result, had underestimated the scope and scale of the United States government’s searches of private internet communications. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 5:07 am by Jamison Koehler
” The standard was further refined by a succession of Supreme Court cases, including United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 10:06 am by Anne Egeler
-stage amicus brief on behalf of Washington, fourteen other states, and the District of Columbia in support of the Obama administration in United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
And the Strasbourg Court has stated unambiguously that it regards the strictest institution permitted by UK law, the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC), to be a  ”fully independent court” which is best placed to ensure that no material was unnecessarily withheld from the detainee (A v United Kingdom 49 EHRR 695). [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 1:35 pm by Ronald Mann
But since it has no home State in the United States, that means that in that situation, there’s no place for plaintiffs to come together and sue that person, correct? [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 3:00 pm by Jon Katz
Virginia criminal attorney says that Curley further entrenches our over-policed society We live in an over-policed society where law enforcement is permitted by the United States Supreme Court to make pretextual traffic stops for the purpose of investigating for criminal activity, and where the Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable search and seizure is watered down by such SCOTUS rulings as Terry v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 9:00 am by Larry
Customs examined the factors set out in United States v. [read post]