Search for: "Scales v. United States"
Results 341 - 360
of 2,450
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2023, 5:00 am
One year ago tomorrow, in West Virginia v. [read post]
23 Jul 2022, 2:31 pm
Paxton, and now United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 6:49 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 4:30 pm
This past May, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit heard oral arguments regarding Richard Prince’s appeal on the standing Cariou v. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 6:20 am
The big loser, of course, was the United States, now rated a flawed democracy because of the quantitative effects of Mr. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 1:37 pm
Below is a short description of each case: State of Washington v. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 2:06 am
Theresa Barr (former ADO) won in State v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 9:04 pm
Here’s the press release: TradeComet.com LLC filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, a complaint asserting Google violates antitrust laws by eliminating competition and choice. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 12:04 pm
Telecom Association v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:50 am
Yesterday’s second argument was in United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 10:08 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Even though Congress cannot forbid firearms in school zones under the Commerce Power (as the Court said it cannot in United States v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 6:20 am
This sliding scale approach fleshes out Justice Kennedy’s reference in Kerry v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 5:55 am
And, in Dames & Moore v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 10:31 pm
There is a real constitutional crisis in the judiciary of some states (and no, Justice Roberts, it’s not the judicial pay scale). [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 6:27 am
Among them are Curtis Publishing Co. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 3:23 pm
Army Corps of Engineers the power to regulate the “discharge of dredged and fill material to the waters of the United States. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
He argues that Clinton v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 9:00 am
–Andrew V. [read post]
