Search for: "Scales v. United States" Results 381 - 400 of 1,910
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2020, 2:23 pm by Nathan Dorn
Hunter’s Lessee, and the United States v. the Amistad. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 7:06 am by Kent Scheidegger
United States is 4-1-4, with Justice Ginsburg writing the plurality opinion and Justice Alito concurring in the judgment in a separate opinion. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:30 pm
In late May 2008, the United States - in response to the Court's late January call for the views of the Solicitor General - filed a brief in which it urges the Court to grant certiorari. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 10:48 am
The United States and other allied countries conquered and now occupy and control Japan. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
So, ‘the law and practice of the United States allow the large-scale collection of the personal data of citizens of the Union …without those citizens benefiting from effective judicial protection’ (para 158). [read post]
16 May 2017, 2:55 pm by Chuck Peterson
Just how far does the fourth amendment to the United States Constitution go to protect against a warrantless search of an apartment? [read post]
16 May 2017, 2:55 pm by Chuck Peterson
Just how far does the fourth amendment to the United States Constitution go to protect against a warrantless search of an apartment? [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 7:29 am by Jeffrey Hamlin
Appellate courts do not often reverse a trial judge’s decision to grant a new trial, so we took notice when the First Circuit did so in United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 4:38 am
There is no Border Detention Order in the United Kingdom. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:49 pm by NL
A personal status did not need to be immutable or innate (Clift v the United Kingdom no 7205/07 July 2010 and A, and Others v the United Kingdom [GC] no 3455/05 ECHR 2009). 5. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:49 pm by NL
A personal status did not need to be immutable or innate (Clift v the United Kingdom no 7205/07 July 2010 and A, and Others v the United Kingdom [GC] no 3455/05 ECHR 2009). 5. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:53 am by Lindsay J. Jarusiewicz
After the plaintiffs executed purchase agreements for their respective units, the scope of the project was scaled back. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
United States (Congress can’t commandeer state executives unless it does so incidentally through laws applicable to private actors too), Alden v. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
How do the bishops continue to wield sufficient political power to pack the United States Supreme Court while under the microscope for destroying so many children and families? [read post]