Search for: "Scales v. United States"
Results 381 - 400
of 2,612
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2022, 6:52 am
Whitaker v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm
United States Postal Service, the D.C. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 10:04 am
In United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
In a joint statement, the leaders of AUKUS—Prime Minister Scott Morrison of Australia, Prime Minister Boris Johnson of the United Kingdom, and President Joe Biden—stated that they were committing “to commence new trilateral cooperation on hypersonics and counter-hypersonics, and electronic warfare capabilities, as well as to expand information sharing and to deepen cooperation on defense innovation. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 8:21 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 9:08 pm
The Court’s decision in the latest of these cases, West Virginia v. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 10:52 am
It's now out in print, from the Cambridge University Press: Mark V. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 6:14 am
It is a felony to traffic drugs in the United States. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 9:05 pm
Scales suggests that states ensure that home care workers receive competitive compensation and improved training. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 4:05 am
That change is visible within the apex organs of the contemporary state system ((Text of A/ES-11/L.1; UN General Assembly Resolution -- "Aggression against Ukraine"; UKRAINE v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 12:37 pm
See United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 7:39 pm
(Backer, Tweaking Facts, Speaking Judgment: Judicial Transmogrification of Case Narrative as Jurisprudence in the United States and Britain, Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 6:611, 616 (1998).)This insight may help untangle some of the discursive trajectories in the case and the declaraitons. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 9:20 am
Just like anyone else in the United States. [read post]
12 Mar 2022, 4:23 pm
From Hiers v. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 1:37 pm
UFLPA effectively creates a rebuttable presumption that all goods manufactured wholly or in part in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region are the product of forced labor, and are therefore banned from importation into the United States.[12] The rebuttable presumption will apply unless an importer is able to demonstrate that it: Fully compiled with new importer guidance and any regulations issued to implement that guidance; Completely and substantively responded to all inquires for… [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
Supreme Court’s statement in Reiter v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm
On 1 March 2022 Nicklin J heard an application in the case of SMO v Tik Tok Inc. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
The Supreme Court [of the United States] subsequently rejected such inferences as incompatible with ordinary contract principles under federal law in M and G Polymers USA, LLC v Tackett (574 US 427 [2015]) and CNH Industrial N.V. v Reese (583 US 138 S Ct 761 [2018]), repudiating International Union, United Auto., Aerospace, and Agric. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
The Supreme Court [of the United States] subsequently rejected such inferences as incompatible with ordinary contract principles under federal law in M and G Polymers USA, LLC v Tackett (574 US 427 [2015]) and CNH Industrial N.V. v Reese (583 US 138 S Ct 761 [2018]), repudiating International Union, United Auto., Aerospace, and Agric. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 4:30 am
Abbasi in 2017 and Hernandez v. [read post]
