Search for: "Scales v. United States"
Results 501 - 520
of 2,461
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2020, 2:23 pm
Hunter’s Lessee, and the United States v. the Amistad. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 2:01 am
Indeed, Japan has a record of allowing approximately 14% of patents that are granted in the United States. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 7:06 am
United States is 4-1-4, with Justice Ginsburg writing the plurality opinion and Justice Alito concurring in the judgment in a separate opinion. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 9:00 am
United States decision prohibits involuntary transfer. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 8:12 am
Now available in redacted form: the government’s opposition brief and the defendant’s reply in United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 10:48 am
The United States and other allied countries conquered and now occupy and control Japan. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:30 pm
In late May 2008, the United States - in response to the Court's late January call for the views of the Solicitor General - filed a brief in which it urges the Court to grant certiorari. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 10:02 pm
She was named Director of the Human Trafficking Unit at the State Attorney's Office. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 4:38 am
There is no Border Detention Order in the United Kingdom. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:53 am
After the plaintiffs executed purchase agreements for their respective units, the scope of the project was scaled back. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 4:23 pm
So, ‘the law and practice of the United States allow the large-scale collection of the personal data of citizens of the Union …without those citizens benefiting from effective judicial protection’ (para 158). [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 4:31 pm
Lewis v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 5:56 am
With Monday’s filing of the reply briefs by the government and the intervenors, the briefing in the DAPA case, United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 11:37 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 5:00 am
In Day, et al. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 12:04 pm
As the Supreme Court struck down the core of the so-called "Defense of Marriage Act" in United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 9:47 am
Although the average course on civics or government thoroughly reviews the provisions of the United States Constitution, many overlook the importance of state constitutions as sources of important rights. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:46 am
In its 1997 decision, United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
How do the bishops continue to wield sufficient political power to pack the United States Supreme Court while under the microscope for destroying so many children and families? [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Constitution of the United States The Court indicated that the assessment is not really a "penalty. [read blog]