Search for: "Scales v. United States"
Results 721 - 740
of 2,240
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2022, 2:12 pm
Emotional distress damages are not recoverable in a private action to enforce the disability discrimination and accommodation requirements of either the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (“Rehab Act”) or the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”) according to the May 1, 2022 United States Supreme Court ruling in Cummings v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 7:12 am
In the wake of the Supreme Court’s Morrison v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 7:12 am
In the wake of the Supreme Court’s Morrison v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 9:26 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 2:33 pm
§337(a), which explicitly provides that all enforcement of the FDCA "shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 12:23 pm
The Supreme Court heard oral argument today in Janus v. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 6:51 am
The federal government’s arguments Assistant to the Solicitor General Michael Huston argued for the United States in support of Egbert. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:59 am
More Blog Entries: United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 1:31 pm
Supreme Court case of Gibbons v. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 1:31 pm
Supreme Court case of Gibbons v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 6:58 am
As the two largest consumers and producers of energy, there can be no solution to this challenge without the efforts of both China and the United States. [read post]
27 May 2011, 11:59 am
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Decided on rehearing en banc: May 25, 2011 http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/images/stories/opinions-orders/08-1511.pdf The Federal Circuit has changed the rules governing the patent infringement defense of inequitable conduct, or as it is sometimes called “fraud on the patent office. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am
Importantly, the Court’s discussion of the source-identifying function of trademarks, repeated emphasis on source confusion as the principal harm in trademark law (see, e.g., the type of confusion “most commonly in trademark law’s sights”, “the bête noire of trademark law”, and the “cardinal sin under the law”), and discussion of the United We Stand America opinion suggests the Justices may like Rogers’ focus on preventing uses… [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 4:44 am
” Briefly: At the National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses the court’s recent decision to review National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 2:51 pm
United States to support the slippery slope argument that “unconstitutional practices get their first footing…by silent approaches and slight deviations. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 1:12 pm
The court distinguished United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
Court H.R., Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, 1 July 2008, no. 58243/00, § 62 and 63; Rotaru v. [read post]
3 Jan 2025, 8:25 am
United States) and the power of a bankruptcy trustee to avoid a debtor’s tax payment to the United States (United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 3:42 pm
Jan. 7, 2013), the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld (pdf) a biological opinion issued by the U.S. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 6:56 am
Asbestos has not been produced in the United States for decades, and while it is still being imported in small quantities, the real danger lies in the asbestos that fills many of the older buildings in Boston and the rest of the nation. [read post]