Search for: "Scales v. United States"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,895
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2020, 2:16 pm
In South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 11:00 am
Toomey argued that the district court had misunderstood several important technical aspects of Upstream surveillance and, as a result, had underestimated the scope and scale of the United States government’s searches of private internet communications. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 9:00 am
Customs examined the factors set out in United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:01 am
Still, we doubt the fact of confusion and uncertainty, standing alone, would warrant an inquiry as to the views of the United States. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
United States, has restored over the past decade a meaningful and responsible role to judges at sentencing. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 3:43 am
United States. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 10:06 am
-stage amicus brief on behalf of Washington, fourteen other states, and the District of Columbia in support of the Obama administration in United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 3:00 pm
Virginia criminal attorney says that Curley further entrenches our over-policed society We live in an over-policed society where law enforcement is permitted by the United States Supreme Court to make pretextual traffic stops for the purpose of investigating for criminal activity, and where the Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable search and seizure is watered down by such SCOTUS rulings as Terry v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 12:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 1:35 pm
But since it has no home State in the United States, that means that in that situation, there’s no place for plaintiffs to come together and sue that person, correct? [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 7:43 am
Wong and United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 2:27 pm
Instead, EFF and the ACLU point to a series of recent key decisions—including the Supreme Court decisions in United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 7:38 am
Osofsky, The intersection of scale, science, and law in Massachusetts v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 7:04 am
United States Tennis Ass’n, No. 1:11-cv-6268 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 8:54 am
The United States Supreme Court disagreed. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 5:07 am
The standard was further refined by a succession of Supreme Court cases, including United States v. [read post]
Grant of Rule 29 Motion Based on Sufficiency Grounds and Issued After Jury’s Guilty Verdict Reversed
16 Jul 2012, 11:24 am
In United States v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 2:06 pm
United States, 436 U.S. 128, 130-43 (1978); United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 3:20 pm
States, SE & SW Areas Health & Welfare Fund v. [read post]
