Search for: "Schachter v. Citigroup, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 20
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Schachter v. Citigroup, Inc. holds that forfeiture of restricted stock shares during restriction period does not run afoul of Labor Code section 201, 201 and 219
2 Nov 2009, 8:15 pm
Citigroup, Inc. [read post]
the complex litigator - http://www.thecomplexlitigator.com/post-data/
California Supreme Court Carves Out Additional Exception to Definition of Accrued Wages in Schachter v. Citigroup, Inc.
3 Nov 2009, 7:03 am by Matt C. Bailey
On November 2, 2009, the California Supreme Court issued an opinion in Schachter v. [read post]
Bailey Class Action Daily - http://www.baileydaily.com/
California Supreme Court Upholds Voluntary Employee Incentive Compensation Plan
3 Nov 2009, 3:38 pm by Sheppard Mullin
Citigroup, Inc. [read post]
Labor Employment Law Blog - http://www.laboremploymentlawblog.com/
California Supreme Court Upholds Voluntary Employee Incentive Compensation Plan
3 Nov 2009, 3:38 pm by Sheppard Mullin
Citigroup, Inc. [read post]
Labor & Employment Law Blog - http://www.laboremploymentlawblog.com/
Cal. Supreme Court Upholds Bonus Forfeiture Agreement
27 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm by Steven G. Pearl
Citigroup, Inc. [read post]
The California Wage and Hour Law Blog for Employees - http://cawageandhourlaw.blogspot.com/
Supreme Court To Review Stock Forfeiture Case
19 May 2008, 1:00 pm
You can download the full text of Schachter v. [read post]
Wage Law - http://www.californiawagelaw.com/wage_law/
California Supreme Court Upholds Forfeiture Provision In Employee Incentive Plan
19 Jan 2010, 9:21 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
  In Schachter v. [read post]
Hunton Employment & Labor Law Perspectives - http://www.huntonlaborblog.com/
Vesting of Incentive Compensation -- Schachter v. Citigroup, Inc.
6 Nov 2009, 7:04 am
Citigroup, Inc. [read post]
California Labor and Employment Defense Blog - http://www.vtzlawblog.com/
Class Action Defense Cases–Schachter v. Citigroup: California Supreme Court Affirms Defense Judgment In Labor Law Class Action Holding Forfeiture Of Restricted Stock Shares Upon Termination Did Not Violate California Labor Code
16 Nov 2009, 8:11 pm
Schachter v. [read post]
Class Action Defense Blog - https://www.reallaw.us/posts/
California Opens The Door, Slightly, To Wage Deductions At Termination
14 Jan 2014, 7:57 am by Michael D. Thompson
Citigroup, Inc., 47 Cal. 3d 610 (2009), in which the California Supreme Court enforced vesting and forfeiture provisions contained in an incentive plan. [read post]
Wage & Hour Defense Blog - http://www.wagehourblog.com/
Class Action Defense Cases–Schachter v. Citigroup: California Supreme Court Affirms Defense Judgment In Labor Law Class Action Holding Forfeiture Of Restricted Stock Shares Upon Termination Did Not Violate California Labor Code
17 Nov 2009, 4:11 am by Michael J. Hassen
Schachter v. [read post]
Class Action Defense Blog - http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/
California Supreme Court Upholds Forfeiture Provision In Incentive Compensation Plan
2 Nov 2009, 11:27 am
Weideman The California Supreme Court issued its decision in Schachter v. [read post]
California Labor & Employment Law Blog - http://www.callaborlaw.com/
Labor Law Class Action Defense Cases-Schachter v. Citigroup: California State Court Affirms Summary Judgment In Favor Of Defense In Labor Law Class Action Challenging Forfeiture Provisions Of Voluntary Employee Incentive Compensation Plan
26 Mar 2008, 5:06 am
Schachter v. [read post]
Class Action Defense Blog - http://classactiondefense.jmbm.com/
California Supreme Court Grants Review of Stock Forfeiture Case
21 May 2008, 10:26 am
BoydThe California Supreme Court has granted a petition for review in Schachter v. [read post]
California Labor & Employment Law Blog - http://www.callaborlaw.com/
Stock Forfeiture Plan Does Not Violate Labor Code
18 Apr 2008, 4:00 pm
Schachter v. [read post]
Wage Law - http://www.californiawagelaw.com/wage_law/
California Opens The Door, Slightly, To Wage Deductions At Termination Continue Reading…
14 Jan 2014, 7:57 am by <a href='http://www.ebglaw.com/'>Epstein Becker Green</a>
Citigroup, Inc., 47 Cal. 3d 610 (2009), in which the California Supreme Court enforced vesting and forfeiture provisions contained in an incentive plan. [read post]
Wage & Hour Defense Blog - http://www.wagehourblog.com/
California Supreme Court Hears Important Employment Law Cases
3 Sep 2009, 3:17 pm
Citigroup, Inc., and Costco Wholesale Corp. v. [read post]
California Labor & Employment Law Blog - http://www.callaborlaw.com/
Court Of Appeal Holds Stock Options Are Not Wages, But Damages Need Not Be Measured At The Time Of Breach
9 Apr 2024, 12:15 am
Citigroup, Inc. [read post]
California Corporate & Securities Law - https://www.calcorporatelaw.com/
Key California Employment Decisions from 2009
26 Feb 2010, 7:12 am
Citigroup, Inc., S161385, finding Citigroup’s incentive compensation plan’s forfeiture of unvested stock did not violation California Labor Code sections 201 or 202. [read post]
Quirky Employment Law Questions - http://www.quirkyemploymentquestions.com/
Stock Options Are Not “Wages” in California
22 Apr 2024, 9:50 am by James W. Ward
” Shah pointed to a California Supreme Court case (Schachter v. [read post]
HR Watchdog - http://hrwatchdog.calchamber.com/