Search for: "Schachter v. Citigroup, Inc."
Results 1 - 19
of 19
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2009, 7:03 am
On November 2, 2009, the California Supreme Court issued an opinion in Schachter v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 3:38 pm
Citigroup, Inc. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 3:38 pm
Citigroup, Inc. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
Citigroup, Inc. [read post]
19 May 2008, 1:00 pm
You can download the full text of Schachter v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 9:21 am
In Schachter v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 7:04 am
Citigroup, Inc. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 8:11 pm
Schachter v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 7:57 am
Citigroup, Inc., 47 Cal. 3d 610 (2009), in which the California Supreme Court enforced vesting and forfeiture provisions contained in an incentive plan. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 4:11 am
Schachter v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 5:06 am
Schachter v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 11:27 am
Weideman The California Supreme Court issued its decision in Schachter v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 10:26 am
BoydThe California Supreme Court has granted a petition for review in Schachter v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 4:00 pm
Schachter v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 7:57 am
Citigroup, Inc., 47 Cal. 3d 610 (2009), in which the California Supreme Court enforced vesting and forfeiture provisions contained in an incentive plan. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 3:17 pm
Citigroup, Inc., and Costco Wholesale Corp. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 12:15 am
Citigroup, Inc. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 7:12 am
Citigroup, Inc., S161385, finding Citigroup’s incentive compensation plan’s forfeiture of unvested stock did not violation California Labor Code sections 201 or 202. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 9:50 am
” Shah pointed to a California Supreme Court case (Schachter v. [read post]