Search for: "Schachtman"
Results 1 - 20 of 61
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2017, 5:46 am
Schwartz, Ph.D. of Innovative Science Solutions LLC and Nathan Schachtman, Esq. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 10:40 pm
Following up on our earlier correspondence, attorney Nathan Schachtman of Phillips Lytle LLP writes: There is a widespread misconception that the dangerousness of asbestos to end users was somehow not known before Dr. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 10:14 pm
Nathan Schachtman of McCarter & English has a two-pager (PDF) for the Washington Legal Foundation on the recent ruling by an agency of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania that mass silicosis screenings at three motel parking lots, instigated by a Texas... [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 3:36 am by tortsprof
Nathan Schachtman, a former big firm defense lawyer now practicing on his own, has started a new blog focused on torts and scientific evidence (one of my particular interests), "Tortini: For your delectation and delight, desultory dicta on the law... [read post]
31 May 2007, 3:46 am
The WLF has a piece [PDF] by defense lawyer Nathan Schachtman (at McCarter English) about state regulators imposing sanctions based on the 2002 silicosis screenings in Pennsylvania.In February 2002, Texas invaded Pennsylvania. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 10:07 pm
I recently received this note (which I reprint here with his permission) from Philadelphia toxic-tort attorney Nathan Schachtman of Phillips Lytle LLP (and formerly of McCarter & English LLP). [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 8:53 am
With permission, I reproduce below a blog post on the case from attorney Nathan Schachtman, whose blog readers should follow if they are interested in the intricacies of expert testimony. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 9:22 am by David Bernstein
(David Bernstein) Posted with permission from the SchachtmanLaw blog. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 8:19 pm by Schachtman
Schachtman & Venderbush, “Matrixx Unbounded: High Court’s Ruling Needlessly Complicates Scientific Evidence Principles,” 26 (14) Legal Backgrounder (June 17, 2011)[1]. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 10:31 am by William A. Ruskin
 Thus, Schachtman argues, the authors were not disinterested researchers inadvertently caught up in litigation. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 9:06 am by Schachtman
Schachtman 11:37 AM (12 minutes ago) to me From: Nathan A. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 5:05 am by Ted Frank
Attorney Nathan Schachtman (via Childs) finds a very good example in the Avandia MDL, which independently raises the question why judges who don't understand science or questions of statistics are assigned to MDLs where science and questions of statistics are going to be decisive factors. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 3:09 pm by Schachtman
But Schachtman’s true agenda emerged in the middle of his third paragraph. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 9:13 pm by Walter Olson
[Russell Jackson] C’mon, DoJ, stop spreading domestic violence myths [Christina Hoff Sommers, USA Today] “Historians as Experts: A Plea for Help” [Bill Childs, TortsProf; related, Nathan Schachtman] Might not really work, though: “A call for aviation liability reform in South Dakota” [PoL] “Chevron Turns Tables on Ecuador Plaintiffs; Sues Them” [WSJ Law Blog, ShopFloor, more, yet more, NYLJ] Hedge funder plays race card against NYC’s famed Dakota co-op. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 7:27 am by Glenn Reynolds
Parallel to Noah Schachtman’s excellent write-up contrasting his experiences while embedded with Marines in Helmand Province versus what WikiLeaks provides, you would have little visibility on the actual maneuver of troops, the relationship that they have with the populace, and the effectiveness of Afghan forces. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:22 am by Schachtman
Schachtman & Venderbush, “Matrixx Unbounded: High Court’s Ruling Needlessly Complicates Scientific Evidence Principles,” 26 (14) Legal Backgrounder (June 17, 2011). [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 9:11 pm by Ted Frank
[Schachtman; earlier] Ed Warren and Dan Troy on punitive damages. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 11:39 am by Schachtman
But Schachtman’s true agenda emerged in the middle of his third paragraph. [read post]