Search for: "Schachtman" Results 61 - 80 of 84
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2012, 9:14 am by Schachtman
Finkelstein, Basic Concepts of Probability and Statistics in the Law 86-87 (2009)(criticizing the over-interpretation of confidence intervals by the Brock court); Schachtman, “Confidence in Intervals and Diffidence in the Courts” (Mar. 4, 2012). [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:01 am by Schachtman
Law School Courses Columbia Law School: Statistics for Lawyers (Schachtman) Emory Law:  Analytical Methods for Lawyers; Statistics for Lawyers (Joanna M. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 10:32 am by Schachtman
  See Schachtman & Venderbush, “Matrixx Unbounded: High Court’s Ruling Needlessly Complicates Scientific Evidence Principles,” W.L.F. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 10:26 am by Schachtman
As a matter of policy, I leave the comment field turned off on this blog. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 11:07 am by Schachtman
” 36 Issues in Science and Technology (Fall 2019). [7]  See Schachtman, “Infante-lizing the IARC” (May 13, 2018); “The IARC Process is Broken” (May 4, 2016). [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 12:59 pm by admin
Carl Cranor pays me the dubious honor of quoting my assessment of weight of the evidence (WOE) pseudo-methodology as used by lawsuit industry expert witnesses, in one of his recent publications: “Take all the evidence, throw it into the hopper, close your eyes, open your heart, and guess the weight. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 3:35 pm by Schachtman
The American Public Health Association (APHA) is a significant organization ostensibly committed to the improvement of public health. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 11:49 am by Schachtman
The Federal Multi-District Silicosis Proceedings Before Judge Janis Jack One of the most significant developments in the role of scientific and medical evidence gatekeeping under Rule 702, and the Supreme Court’s decision in Daubert,[1] was the 2005 opinion of Judge Janis Graham Jack in the multi-district silicosis litigation.[2] Judge Jack’s lengthy opinion addresses a variety of procedural issues, including subject matter jurisdiction over some of the cases, but Her Honor’s focus… [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 1:15 pm by Schachtman
For reasons that are not clear, the Reporters for the American Law Institute’s most recent torts Restatement decided to tackle an expert witness issue, the meaning of “reasonable degree of medical certainty” (RDMC). [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 11:09 am by Schachtman
See Schachtman, How Testifying Historians Are Like Lawn-Mowing Dogs (May 15, 2010). [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:40 pm by Schachtman
Professors Michael Green and Joseph Sanders are two of the longest serving interlocutors in the never-ending discussion and debate about the nature and limits of expert witness testimony on scientific questions about causation. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 2:30 pm by Schachtman
Sander Greenland is one of the few academics, who has served as an expert witness, who has written post-mortems of his involvement in various litigations[1]. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 2:38 pm by Schachtman
Sander Greenland is one of the few academics, who has served as an expert witness, who has written post-mortems of his involvement in various litigations[1]. [read post]
27 Mar 2021, 1:19 pm by admin
Well, soon the pandemic of Trump Flu will come to a close. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 2:58 am
Law Blogs with a New York focus Of the 6,715 Blawgs in 75 subcategories cataloged reported by Justia on July 17, 2012, 277 are classified as Law Blogs with a New York focus. [read post]