Search for: "Schachtman" Results 61 - 80 of 80
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2011, 10:32 am by Schachtman
  See Schachtman & Venderbush, “Matrixx Unbounded: High Court’s Ruling Needlessly Complicates Scientific Evidence Principles,” W.L.F. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:22 am by Schachtman
  Schachtman & Venderbush, “Matrixx Unbounded: High Court’s Ruling Needlessly Complicates Scientific Evidence Principles,” 26 (14) Legal Backgrounder (June 17, 2011). [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 11:56 am by Schachtman
  See Schachtman, Power in the Courts, Part Two (2011). [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 9:13 pm by Walter Olson
” [Russell Jackson] C’mon, DoJ, stop spreading domestic violence myths [Christina Hoff Sommers, USA Today] “Historians as Experts: A Plea for Help” [Bill Childs, TortsProf; related, Nathan Schachtman] Might not really work, though: “A call for aviation liability reform in South Dakota” [PoL] “Chevron Turns Tables on Ecuador Plaintiffs; Sues Them” [WSJ Law Blog, ShopFloor, more, yet more, NYLJ] Hedge funder plays race card against… [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 9:11 pm by Ted Frank
[Schachtman; earlier] Ed Warren and Dan Troy on punitive damages. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 5:05 am by Ted Frank
Attorney Nathan Schachtman (via Childs) finds a very good example in the Avandia MDL, which independently raises the question why judges who don't understand science or questions of statistics are assigned to MDLs where science and questions of statistics are going to be decisive factors. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 3:36 am by tortsprof
Nathan Schachtman, a former big firm defense lawyer now practicing on his own, has started a new blog focused on torts and scientific evidence (one of my particular interests), "Tortini: For your delectation and delight, desultory dicta on the law... [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 1:15 pm by Schachtman
For reasons that are not clear, the Reporters for the American Law Institute’s most recent torts Restatement decided to tackle an expert witness issue, the meaning of “reasonable degree of medical certainty” (RDMC). [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 11:39 am by Schachtman
But Schachtman’s true agenda emerged in the middle of his third paragraph. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 11:09 am by Schachtman
See Schachtman, How Testifying Historians Are Like Lawn-Mowing Dogs (May 15, 2010). [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 7:27 am by Schachtman
See also Schachtman, Silica Litigation: Screening, Scheming & Suing; Washington Legal Foundation Critical Legal Issues Working Paper Series No. 135 (Dec. 2005)(exploring the ethical and legal implications of the entrepreneurial litigation in which Levy and others were so heavily involved); available at [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 7:27 am by Glenn Reynolds
Parallel to Noah Schachtman’s excellent write-up contrasting his experiences while embedded with Marines in Helmand Province versus what WikiLeaks provides, you would have little visibility on the actual maneuver of troops, the relationship that they have with the populace, and the effectiveness of Afghan forces. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:26 am by Schachtman
Courting Clio:  Historians and Their Testimony in Products Liability Litigation By Schachtman, N.A.*, and Ulizio, J.A.1             Parallel developments in mid-20th century medicine and American tort law resulted in the need to resolve factual disputes about events several decades old. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 4:40 pm
Update: Noah Schachtman and Think Progress has more unpleasant Hayden memories. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 1:07 pm
Schachtman quotes one of the blogs that has been blocked for view, In From the Cold, which wrote:"Obviously, DoD [Department of Defense] can decide what internet content should be filtered -- they spent billions on the IT architecture and billions more to maintain it. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 10:40 pm
Following up on our earlier correspondence, attorney Nathan Schachtman of Phillips Lytle LLP writes: There is a widespread misconception that the dangerousness of asbestos to end users was somehow not known before Dr. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 10:07 pm
I recently received this note (which I reprint here with his permission) from Philadelphia toxic-tort attorney Nathan Schachtman of Phillips Lytle LLP (and formerly of McCarter & English LLP). [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 10:14 pm
Nathan Schachtman of McCarter & English has a two-pager (PDF) for the Washington Legal Foundation on the recent ruling by an agency of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania that mass silicosis screenings at three motel parking lots, instigated by a Texas... [read post]
31 May 2007, 3:46 am
The WLF has a piece [PDF] by defense lawyer Nathan Schachtman (at McCarter English) about state regulators imposing sanctions based on the 2002 silicosis screenings in Pennsylvania.In February 2002, Texas invaded Pennsylvania. [read post]