Search for: "Schachtman"
Results 61 - 80
of 88
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2012, 6:41 am
See Schachtman, “State Regulators Impose Sanction for Unlawful Silicosis Screenings,” 17(13) Wash. [read post]
29 May 2012, 4:48 am
Schachtman, and I (naturally) disagree with much of what they conclude. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 4:24 am
Nathan Schachtman says “there is a good deal of equivocation between encouraging judges to look at scientific validity, and discouraging them from any meaningful analysis by emphasizing inaccurate proxies for validity, such as conflicts of interest. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:40 pm
Professors Michael Green and Joseph Sanders are two of the longest serving interlocutors in the never-ending discussion and debate about the nature and limits of expert witness testimony on scientific questions about causation. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 9:06 am
Schachtman 11:37 AM (12 minutes ago) to me From: Nathan A. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 7:56 am
Schachtman, is in private practice in New York City, and is a lecturer-in-law at the Columbia Law School. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 7:56 am
Schachtman, is in private practice in New York City, and is a lecturer-in-law at the Columbia Law School. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 7:14 am
(originally posted at Tortini on October 14, 2011.) [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 7:14 am
(originally posted at Tortini on October 14, 2011.) [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 10:32 am
See Schachtman & Venderbush, “Matrixx Unbounded: High Court’s Ruling Needlessly Complicates Scientific Evidence Principles,” W.L.F. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:22 am
Schachtman & Venderbush, “Matrixx Unbounded: High Court’s Ruling Needlessly Complicates Scientific Evidence Principles,” 26 (14) Legal Backgrounder (June 17, 2011). [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 11:56 am
See Schachtman, Power in the Courts, Part Two (2011). [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 9:13 pm
” [Russell Jackson] C’mon, DoJ, stop spreading domestic violence myths [Christina Hoff Sommers, USA Today] “Historians as Experts: A Plea for Help” [Bill Childs, TortsProf; related, Nathan Schachtman] Might not really work, though: “A call for aviation liability reform in South Dakota” [PoL] “Chevron Turns Tables on Ecuador Plaintiffs; Sues Them” [WSJ Law Blog, ShopFloor, more, yet more, NYLJ] Hedge funder plays race card against… [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 9:11 pm
[Schachtman; earlier] Ed Warren and Dan Troy on punitive damages. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 5:05 am
Attorney Nathan Schachtman (via Childs) finds a very good example in the Avandia MDL, which independently raises the question why judges who don't understand science or questions of statistics are assigned to MDLs where science and questions of statistics are going to be decisive factors. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 3:36 am
Nathan Schachtman, a former big firm defense lawyer now practicing on his own, has started a new blog focused on torts and scientific evidence (one of my particular interests), "Tortini: For your delectation and delight, desultory dicta on the law... [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 1:15 pm
For reasons that are not clear, the Reporters for the American Law Institute’s most recent torts Restatement decided to tackle an expert witness issue, the meaning of “reasonable degree of medical certainty” (RDMC). [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 11:39 am
But Schachtman’s true agenda emerged in the middle of his third paragraph. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 11:09 am
See Schachtman, How Testifying Historians Are Like Lawn-Mowing Dogs (May 15, 2010). [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 7:27 am
See also Schachtman, Silica Litigation: Screening, Scheming & Suing; Washington Legal Foundation Critical Legal Issues Working Paper Series No. 135 (Dec. 2005)(exploring the ethical and legal implications of the entrepreneurial litigation in which Levy and others were so heavily involved); available at http://www.wlf.org/upload/1205WPSchachtman.pdf. [read post]
