Search for: "Schaefer v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 79
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2010, 2:43 pm
An empirical study of climate change litigation in the United States. 40 Envtl. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:00 am
United States, 642 F. [read post]
13 May 2012, 10:17 pm
Litigation: Deference to Agency Briefs – Never Mind: The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit found that pharmaceutical sales representatives fell under the unambiguous administrative exception to the Department of Labor (DOL)’s Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) regulations in Schaefer-LaRose v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:50 am
Overtime Pay Litigation, 2008 WL 4712769 at *2 (same); Schaefer–LaRose v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 7:46 am
Schaefer-Larose v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 2:08 pm
Writing for the majority in Bostic v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 1:51 pm
Bostic (Virginia), Schaefer v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 8:17 am
See Schaefer-LaRose v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 10:30 am
Schaefer v. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
This prompted the prosecutor to check with the United States Attorney’s office. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
" Five of the Justices in United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 8:27 am
The case, Schaefer v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 8:27 am
The case, Schaefer v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 5:57 am
We serve clients throughout the entire United States. [read post]
24 May 2012, 12:02 pm
The Seventh Circuit took up this issue through a consolidated opinion on two collective actions, Schaefer-LaRose v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 1:02 pm
The Seventh Circuit took up this issue through a consolidated opinion on two collective actions, Schaefer-LaRose v. [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 4:41 pm
United States Smartmatic, [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 3:56 am
Texas, 539 U.S. 588 (2003) (criminalization of same sex sexual conduct is unconstitutional), United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
John Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm
Norquist states that his pledge is self-enforcing—”candidates and incumbents solemnly bind themselves”—but in a leading case cited in the Standler essay (above), Schaefer v. [read post]
