Search for: "Schiff v. Schiff" Results 1 - 20 of 208
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2013, 5:47 am by Jim Walker
Photo Credits: The Republic (top) and Corriere del Mezzogiorno (V. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 3:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In other words, as the contract of sale had already been signed and altered before the real estate closing, contrary to the Schiff defendants' contention, they did not establish as a matter of law that Gross had "a sufficient opportunity to protect the plaintiffs' rights" (Katz v Herzfeld & Rubin, P.C., 48 AD3d 640, 641), such that Schiff's conduct could not have proximately caused the plaintiff's damages. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 7:40 am by Bexis
May 18, 2012) (medical device manufacturer’s motion) (“Schiff II”); and Schiff v. [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 2:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
There is a not-well known exception to the statute of limitations found in CPLR 203(d) which is explained by the Appellate Division, Second Department in Getzel Schiff & Pesce, LLP v Shtayner 2024 NY Slip Op 06186 Decided on December 11, 2024. [read post]