Search for: "Schmidt v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 505
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2007, 10:36 am
The other opinion issued today, Schmidt v. [read post]
23 Jan 2016, 5:06 pm by Howard Friedman
Schmidt, (KA App., Jan. 22, 2016), the Kansas Court of Appeals sitting en banc split evenly, 7-7, on whether the Kansas state Constitution provides a right to abortion. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 11:43 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Like its federal counterpart, Texas Rule of Evidence 607 provides that The credibility of a witness may be attacked by any party, including the party calling the witness. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 1:40 pm
Source: Pace and Schmidt For personal use only -- Not for Commercial Distribution: Criminal Law & Procedure [09/24] US v. [read post]
5 Oct 2019, 1:01 pm by Kalvis Golde
Although a state attorney general’s office has argued two cases in a given year – last term, Alaska argued Sturgeon v. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Cooper of the Harriburg, PA law office of Schmidt Kramer for bringing this case to my attention.In another case with a similar result, the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania also granted a motion to remand in Sherer v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  The Court ruled that this is so even if the benefits are paid out of a Trust.In so ruling, the Commonwealth Court followed the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's decision in the case of Pennsylvania State Police v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 11:59 am by Lubiner, Schmidt & Palumbo, LLC
If you’re an investor who has purchased Northridge the securities lawfirm of Lubiner, Schmidt & Palumbo please contact the lawfirm of Lubiner, Schmidt and Palumbo for a free consultation. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 10:16 pm
Source: Pace and Schmidt For personal use only -- Not for Commercial Distribution: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Criminal Law & Procedure [09/23] US v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 6:09 am by David Markus
Nixon of Byrne & Nixon LLP, said at the hearing that Liang was the first person to accept responsibility for what happened and that he had cooperated with prosecutors and agreed to testify against another VW executive, Oliver Schmidt, if Schmidt’s case had gone to trial, according to the observer. [read post]