Search for: "Schmitt v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 123
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2006, 12:15 am
In "Carl Schmitt und der 'Heereskonflikt' des Dritten Reiches 1934" (Carl Schmitt and the Third Reich's Army Conflict of 1934), Blasius pulls together a number of powerful texts from the period between the wars that put Schmitt's attitudes in a new light. [read post]
28 May 2018, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Schmitt, University of Dayton School of Law, has posted Courts, Backlash, and Social Change: Learning from the History of Prigg v. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 7:58 am
  Although the district court correctly rejected Schmitt's argument about federal/state disparities, we cannot be confident that it approached the guidelines in the way that United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 10:01 am by Quinta Jurecic
That year, the Court handed down Hamdan v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 3:08 am
Terms of “last chance” agreement in lieu of termination included a valid waiver of the right to arbitrate or litigate his subsequent terminationMatter of James Schmitt v New York State Dept. of Correctional Services, 47 A.D.3d 1098, Motion for leave to appeal denied, 10 N.Y.3d 709James Schmitt, a correction officer at the Washington Correctional Facility in Washington County, served disciplinary charges alleging “excessive absenteeism” The… [read post]
18 May 2018, 5:00 am by Rick Hills
Over the last couple of days, there has been an interesting pop-up symposium between Daniel Hemel, Ilya Somin, Brian Galle, and Jeffrey Schmitt over the true meaning of Murphy v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 5:04 pm
The latest issue of the Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht (Vol. 80, no. 3, 2020) is out. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm by Anthony Gaughan
Just as a quick follow up to Jeff Schmitt’s post below, it is worth pointing out Justice Anthony Kennedy’s very short but extremely unusual concurring opinion in Trump v. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 6:21 am by Jack Goldsmith
   If the United States wants to take public action against Russia in response to the hack—and indeed, even if it wants (as the NYT puts it) “to publicly accuse the government of President Vladimir V. [read post]