Search for: "Schmitt v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 165
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2008, 6:47 pm
These include, among others, the United States's stubbornly retentioninst position in the face of the accelerating trend toward abolition among other nations, the legal-doctrinal conundrums that arise when capital defendants waive their right to defend and volunteer for execution (sometimes referred to as state-assisted suicide), and the fact that the heated controversy over the use of international law in the Supreme Court's interpretation of the United… [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 3:00 pm
As Michael Schmitt, the Director of the Tallinn Manual project admits, this difference in interpretation is where that manual departs from Mr. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
Once again, a Justice Dollinger opinion, here in Messsinger v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 5:55 am
And in United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 7:48 pm
Demner, The Nuclear Terrorism Convention: Will Detainees Be Classified as "Enemy Combatants" by the United States Harvard Law Review, Volume 120, Number 1, November 2006 Neal Kumar Katyal, Hamdan v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 2:02 pm
(citing State v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 1:08 pm
Alabama and Food Employees v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 8:28 am
Rumsfeld, Hamdan v. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 1:31 pm
Munch, Wolfgang, Wrongdoing of International Civil Servants -- Referral of Cases to National Authorities for Criminal Prosecution Schmitt, Michael N., International Law and Military Operations in Space Segura-Serrano, Antonio, Internet Regulation and the Role of International Law Leininger, Julia, Democracy and UN Peace-Keeping -- Conflict Resolution through State-Building and Democracy Promotion in Haiti Human Rights Law Review (United Kingdom), Volume 6, Number 3, 2006 David… [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 12:22 pm
” In re Marriage of Schmitt, 321 Ill. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:08 am
Although the IDF receives legal advice on planned operations, including targeting with air-delivered munitions—as noted in this paper by Mike Schmitt and J.J. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:55 pm
Marioni, 2009 BCSC 686 at para 35; Schmitt v. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 8:46 am
” That is, it is judges themselves who have recognized, over the past seventy-five years or so since the seminal case of Crowell v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:58 pm
John Carey, William V. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:19 pm
This creates a tension and sometimes "the state applies its rules in a way that impinges upon the free interchange of ideas that is vital to self-government" as the Sixth Circuit explained recently in Berry v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 12:24 am
Lex Specialis and the Applicability of International Human Rights StandardsConor McCarthy, Legal Reasoning and the Applicability of International Human Rights Standards During Military OccupationRalph Wilde, Triggering State Obligations Extraterritorially: The Spatial Test in Certain Human Rights TreatiesTom Ruys & Sten Verhoeven, DRC v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 10:31 am
PAUL SCHMITT. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 9:48 am
Buzz Photo v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
Yesterday’s oral arguments in FCC v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:05 pm
Co. v. [read post]
