Search for: "Schneider v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 218
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2023, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
With this history in mind, along with (i) foundational principles of state judicial practice and (ii) the shortcomings of the United States Supreme Court’s approach to fractured opinions in Marks v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 2:09 pm by Bridget Crawford
Amanatullah, explore these themes in their article Likeability v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:42 am by Mary L. Dudziak
Hidden Histories, Racialized Gender, and the Legacy of Reconstruction: The Story of United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 6:21 pm
The Kingdom sought review of the same issue in the recognition proceeding in the United States and lost when the United States District Court applied a deferential review. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:18 am by PaulKostro
Magistrate Judge Joel Schneider, THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY, CAMDEN VICINAGE, December 20, 2011: In United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 2:47 pm
United States, which President Bush supported, and the President's decision to commute Scooter Libby's prison sentence. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 9:56 am by Bill Heinze
Utility model protection has resulted in very high damages awards on a case by case basis a trade secret invention practiced in the United States may still be the basis for patenting in other countries; Only the United States adopted the unique bar against patenting an applicant’s secret invention. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:19 am by Amy Howe
United States, involving restitution for victims of child pornography; and White v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 8:00 am by The Docket Navigator
Here, the allegedly infringing products that are ordered by foreign customers were manufactured outside the United States, and distributed to customers outside of the United States. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 7:22 am by Steven Cohen
David Schneider, an orthopedic surgery expert witnesses, stating that he is not qualified to opine on matters that go beyond the expertise of orthopedic surgery. [read post]