Search for: "Schultz v. State" Results 321 - 340 of 356
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Court reconsidering baseless ‘making available’ theory in file-sharing case Capitol Records v Jammie Thomas; amicus briefs from, MPAA, PFF: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Electronic Fontier Foundation), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Patry Copyright Blog) ICANN approves rules allowing brands to be… [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 4:41 pm
6/9/2008 @10:42 PM)     PUBLISHED OPINIONS OpinionShort Title/District 08a0206p.06 2008/06/02 Schultz v. [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 4:41 pm
6/9/2008 @10:42 PM)     PUBLISHED OPINIONS OpinionShort Title/District 08a0206p.06 2008/06/02 Schultz v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
BAC level), whereas HGN does not. 16 A very recent investigation17 found that only HGN was effective at distinguishing persons above or below a BAC of .04%, a standard sometimes applied to drivers of commercial vehicles and, in some states, to drivers younger than 21. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 5:17 pm
By Eric Goldman We're anxiously awaiting oral arguments in the Rescuecom v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 7:40 am
Attempts to Regulate Payday Lenders Currently, garnishment of social security benefits is illegal and all active-duty military families are protected by the Military Lending Act signed into law on October 2006 - capping interest rates at 36% on all small loans, including payday loans, for all military families.[43] Small loans are governed by state law, and many states have implemented restrictions on payday lenders.[44] For example, many state have placed restrictions… [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 11:48 pm
Its purpose is to inform rather than to advocate.The following are among the cases reviewed in the Survey: A California Supreme Court decision involving recordings of cross border communications and another California case raising issues of cross-border discrimination in managing a web site; a product-liability decision of the New Jersey Supreme Court backtracking from its earlier pro-plaintiff decisions, and several other cases continuing to apply the pro-defendant law of the victim's home… [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
Because we find that Staunch was not an "eligible employee" under the FMLA and her state law claims are without merit, we AFFIRM the district court's grant of summary judgment to Continental. 08a0005p.06 Auletta v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 7:02 am
The Nebraska Cerebral Palsy Resource Guide contains a list of State resources compiled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 11:45 am
Supreme Court's decision in Buckeye Check Cashing v. [read post]