Search for: "Schultz v. State" Results 161 - 180 of 356
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2008, 11:48 pm
Its purpose is to inform rather than to advocate.The following are among the cases reviewed in the Survey: A California Supreme Court decision involving recordings of cross border communications and another California case raising issues of cross-border discrimination in managing a web site; a product-liability decision of the New Jersey Supreme Court backtracking from its earlier pro-plaintiff decisions, and several other cases continuing to apply the pro-defendant law of the victim's home… [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 9:57 am by Carolyn E. Wright
A different case on the other side of the United States. . . [read post]
25 May 2012, 3:00 am by Terry Hart
Elliott v Google complaint — Is “Google” at risk of becoming generic? [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 3:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The complaint is "nothing more than a rephrasing of the claim of malpractice in the language of breach of contract" (Mitschele v Schultz, 36 AD3d 249, 252). [read post]