Search for: "Scott v. Armstrong"
Results 1 - 20
of 58
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2024, 6:30 am
Posted by Gail Weinstein, Philip Richter, and Steven Epstein, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, on Tuesday, January 23, 2024 Tags: Activist, Advance Notice Bylaw, Blasius, Bylaw, Chancery, Coster, Kellner, Schnell, Stockholder, Unocal When Myopic Managers Must Mark to Market Posted by Adam Kolasinski (Texas A&M University), and Nan Yang (Hong Kong Polytechnic University), on Tuesday, January 23, 2024 Tags: Banks, CEOs, Executives, Liquidity CSRD Compliance: A Stitch in… [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:30 am
Posted by Gail Weinstein, Philip Richter, and Steven Epstein, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, on Tuesday, January 23, 2024 Tags: Activist, Advance Notice Bylaw, Blasius, Bylaw, Chancery, Coster, Kellner, Schnell, Stockholder, Unocal When Myopic Managers Must Mark to Market Posted by Adam Kolasinski (Texas A&M University), and Nan Yang (Hong Kong Polytechnic University), on Tuesday, January 23, 2024 Tags: Banks, CEOs, Executives, Liquidity CSRD Compliance: A Stitch in… [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:45 pm
Karlan, Kenneth and Harle Montgomery Professor of Public Interest Law and Co-Director of the Supreme Court Litigation Clinic In 1979, Bob Woodward and Scott Armstrong could publish a book about the Supreme Court and title it The Brethren. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:44 am
In 1979, Bob Woodward and Scott Armstrong could publish a book about the Supreme Court and title it The Brethren. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 8:28 am
Scott v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 8:09 am
It is also suspected that Justice McLean provided inside information about the Court’s deliberations in the landmark Dred Scott v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 5:30 am
., at 1 (1959) reprinted in Serial Set v. 12153. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 3:12 pm
In 1979, Bob Woodward and Scott Armstrong published the groundbreaking book, The Brethren. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 4:25 pm
Armstrong v McIntosh (No.4) [2020] WASC 31– a defamation case heard in the Supreme Court of Western Australia. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am
Judge Armstrong dismissed the complaint, without prejudice. [read post]
13 May 2019, 5:51 am
Armstrong v. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 2:33 am
Gulati and others v MGN Ltd (2015): the unredacted judgement At the time of the trial’s conclusion, and for three years afterwards, only a redacted version of the judgment was available. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 3:07 pm
Julien v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 5:46 pm
Amgen Richard Lloyd: The Oil States IPR Case Could Be One Of Those Rare Instances Where SCOTUS Sides With The CAFC Scott Graham: Lawmakers Plot Next Steps On Patent Reform Joseph Herndon: Credit Acceptance v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 10:12 pm
Rice v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am
Question: Based on your extensive research, do you think that Bob Woodward and Scott Armstrong’s major take-away points (beyond United States v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 7:49 am
Kevin Noonan: Merck v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 6:51 am
Newman’s Hugo Black, Laura Kalman’s Abe Fortas, and Mark V. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:12 am
Yates v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 3:35 am
Gans weighs in on the argument in Armstrong v. [read post]
