Search for: "Scott v. London" Results 1 - 20 of 308
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2016, 12:23 pm by Steven W. Seymour
These cameras are often very useful in criminal investigations in England.The post The Queen v Scott and Dyer, Part 2: A Sabbatical in England appeared first on Samuels Yoelin Kantor LLP.. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 3:14 am
High Court (Patents Court) Grimme Landmaschinenfabrik GmbH & Co KG v Scott (t/a Scotts Potato Machinery) [2009] EWHC 2691 (Pat) (03 November 2009) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) ABC & Ors v CDE & Ors [2009] EWHC 2718 (QB) (03 November 2009) Winslet v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2009] EWHC 2735 (QB) (03 November 2009) Debt Collection London Ltd & Anor [...] [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 10:31 pm by Victoria VanBuren
by Alan Scott Rau Some of the readers of this blog may have missed the Ninth Circuit’s recent decision in Cape Flattery Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 11:27 am
The other panelists are the lawyers who argued the Kelo case before the Supreme Court: Scott Bullock for Susette Kelo and the other property owners, and Wesley Horton for the City of New London. [read post]
3 May 2008, 4:18 pm
Scott Bullock, the attorney who argued the landmark eminent domain case, Kelo v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 7:15 am
Given such widespread opposition to the ruling, a book criticizing Kelo may seem no more necessary than a book criticizing Dred Scott or Buck v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 2:17 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Grimme Maschinenfabrik GmbH & Co KG v Scott (t/a Scotts Potato Machinery) [2010] EWCA Civ 1110 (15 October 2010) High Court (Chancery Division) Serious Organised Crime Agency v Szepietowski & Ors [2010] EWHC 2570 (Ch) (15 October 2010) High Court (Family Division) A County Council v SB & Ors [2010] EWHC 2528 (Fam) (15 October 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Hair, R (on the application of) v… [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
Mark Hickford, Victoria University of Wellington Faculty of Law, has posted “Settling Some Very Important Principles of Colonial Law”: Three “Forgotten” Cases of the 1840s, published in Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 2004: 1-30.This article reintroduces the 'forgotten" cases of R v Taylor, Attorney-General v Whitaker and Scott v Grace and considers their specific historical contexts. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:04 pm
.'" (p. 254 [attorney Scott Bullock quoting Potter Stewart].)In other words, with eminent domain, it's about people, not property.Jeff Benedict's Little Pink House especially reveals and revels in the human drama surrounding the Kelo v. [read post]