Search for: "Scott v. Scott" Results 101 - 120 of 8,326
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2024, 10:21 am by Will Baude
Two take two of his examples: Chief Justice Roberts's infamous vote and opinion in NFIB v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 8:38 pm by Patricia Salkin
King Sykes, LLC v City of Chicago, 2024 WL 730375 (ND IL 2/22/2024) [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Linda C. McClain
The calls to repeal no-fault divorce are nonsensical, but they result from the sexist attitudes that drove the overruling of Roe v. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
Joseph Scott Miller (University of Georgia School of Law) has posted Perfecting Our Submission? [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Canada On 15 July 2024, the British Columbia Supreme Court threw out retired mining tycoon Scott Cousens’s defamation lawsuit against charity watchdog Vivian Krause, Cousens v Krause, 2024 BCSC 1265 (CanLII). [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 12:05 am by Paul Caron
United States Sunday: The Bible And The Bard: The Gospel According To Shakespeare Tim Scott And... [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 3:20 pm by CFM Admin
In addition to the violations surrounding hypothetical performance, one adviser was also found to have (i) made false and misleading statements, (ii) advertised misleading model performance, (iii) been unable to substantiate performance shown in its advertisements, (iv) failed to enter into written agreements with people it compensated for endorsements, and (v) violated recordkeeping and compliance standards including filing a prospectus with the SEC which contained misleading statements… [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 1:29 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
FTC, 752 F.2d 116 (5th Cir. 1985) (finding that FTC regulations regarding Hart-Scott-Rodino Act entitled to Chevron deference); Nat’l Automobile Dealers Ass’n v. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 3:00 am by M@jux-@dmin
If the defendant knew that what they were doing was extremely dangerous or the situation was such that they should have known that their act would most likely cause harm, Arkansas courts consider that “willful negligence,” according to Scott v. [read post]