Search for: "Scott v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 4,740
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Citizens, 1919-1924Conveners: Kenneth Mack, Harvard Law School (kmack@law.harvard.edu), Laurie Wood, Florida State University (lmwood@fsu.edu), Jacqueline Briggs, University of Toronto - Centre for Criminology and Sociolegal Studies (jacq.briggs@mail.utoronto.ca), and John Wertheimer, Davidson College (jow [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 9:31 am by Eugene Volokh
For another case that takes the same view as Michigan, see State v. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 1:09 pm by Dan Ernst
”Anne Fleming, Georgetown Law (anne.fleming@law.georgetown.edu), ProfessorHousehold Borrowing and Bankruptcy in Jim Crow AmericaCaley Horan, MIT (cdhoran@mit.edu) Associate Professor “Investing in the stars: Astrology and capitalism in modern America”Gautham Rao, American University (grao@american.edu) American University, Associate Professor“The Master's State: Slavery and the American State. [read post]
17 Aug 2019, 5:06 am by Vishnu Kannan
Emma DiNapoli and Jacques Singer-Emery chronicled the latest developments of the military commission in United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 11:24 pm by MOTP
The first loan states:I acknowledge that the requested loan is subject to the limitations on dischargeability in bankruptcy contained in Section 523(a)(8) of the United States Bankruptcy Code. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 11:40 am by Hadley Baker, Vishnu Kannan
Scott Anderson and Benjamin Wittes asked whether the FBI is punishing its employees for their political comments. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 5:45 pm by Angela Bailey
Co-counseling with Ravipudi and Glassman was Scott Liljegren of Liljegren Law Group who is also a Finalist for Consumer Attorney of the Year. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 5:45 pm by Angela Bailey
Panish Shea & Boyle LLP is proud to announce Consumer Attorneys of California (CAOC) have selected the firm’s landmark case Pierce v. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 6:22 am
Most folks on Medicare have either a supplement or a Medicare Advantage plan, both of which are supposed to mitigate the likelihood of just this result.So I reached out to both co-blogger Bob V and FoIB Scott M, both of whom are active in the over-65 market, for their thoughts.Bob offered this take:"Hard to sayOriginal Medicare + supplement = minimal OOP except Rx. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  The Court ruled that this is so even if the benefits are paid out of a Trust.In so ruling, the Commonwealth Court followed the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's decision in the case of Pennsylvania State Police v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Twitter’s policy states that users “may not threaten violence against an individual or a group of people” and the social network prohibits “the glorification of violence. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 12:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
But the blatant-contradiction exception to this limit on the scope of review (which stems from the infamous Scott v. [read post]