Search for: "Seabrooks v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 31
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
Union presence during an interrogation of a unit member by the appointing authority Seabrook v City of New York, 57 AD3d 232 Norman Seabrook, individually and as President of the Correction Officers' Benevolent Association, challenged the policy of not allowing an employee to consult with a union representative after a question is posed and before an answer must be given, at an interrogation conducted pursuant to [New York City] Mayoral Executive Order No. 16. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 9:47 am
The opinion in Farris v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 1:17 pm
Department of Energy, "20% Wind Energy by 2030" (July 2008), stated that such European shallow-water technology is too expensive and too difficult to site in U.S. waters. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 12:15 pm
"The full text of the Seabrook decision is posted on the Internet at:[www.courts.state.ny.us]The text of Executive Order 16 is posted on the Internet at:[www.nyc.gov] [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 5:25 am
That was the holding in the January 19, 2011 Court of Appeals decision in Reiss v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 1:09 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Olden v Serious Organised Crime Agency [2010] EWCA Civ 143 (26 February 2010) Mohamed, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs (Rev 1) [2010] EWCA Civ 158 (26 February 2010) LG, R (on the application of) v Independent Appeal Panel for Tom Hood School & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 142 (26 February 2010) Mann v Northern Electric Distribution Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 141 (26 February… [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 10:19 am
On May 22nd, the United States Supreme Court, in Cooper v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 2:35 am
Click here to go to www.nylj.com
United States, appellee v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
” The court explained that as it had previously ruled, “[w]here a pendent state claim turns on novel or unresolved questions of state law, especially where those questions concern the state’s interest in the administration of its government, principles of federalism and comity may dictate that these questions be left for decision by the state courts,” citing Seabrook v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 4:26 am
" Wal-Mart, 529 U.S. at 212.Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 7:06 am
In any case, it seems that zombification comes from ingesting, as stated by article 246 of the Haitian Criminal Code, “substances which, without giving death, will cause a more-or-less prolonged state of lethargy. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 11:15 am
“[I]t may be useful to supplement that test with the test first introduced in Seabrook Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
In Alden v Maine, 527 US 706, the Supreme Court of the United States found that State sovereign immunity is "implicit in the constitutional design. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 9:03 am
The court of appeals used the four part test set out in Seabrook Foods v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 6:51 am
Payne v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
Courts in New York State have consistently recognized the importance of using progressive discipline.Rulings by the New York State Supreme Court, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, and the Court of Appeals, New York State’s highest court, suggest an employer’s in assigning severe penalties for certain “first offenses” may not survive judicial review. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 3:12 am
Andrusiek v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 7:02 am
Nola Spice Designs, LLC v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
Mary Queen of the Third Millennium, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
The seminal case in New York State regarding standards of fairness is the Pell decision [Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222]. [read post]
