Search for: "Seabrooks v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2023, 11:05 am by Rebecca Tushnet
NY State created a postmortem right of publicity specifically for computer-generated likenesses; Louisiana did so too. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Courts in New York State have consistently recognized the importance of using progressive discipline.Rulings by the New York State Supreme Court, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, and the Court of Appeals, New York State’s highest court, suggest an employer’s in assigning severe penalties for certain “first offenses” may not survive judicial review. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The seminal case in New York State regarding standards of fairness is the Pell decision [Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222]. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 10:19 am by Kathy Darvil
On May 22nd, the United States Supreme Court, in Cooper v. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 11:15 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  “[I]t may be useful to supplement that test with the test first introduced in Seabrook Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 7:06 am by Barbara Bavis
  In any case, it seems that zombification comes from ingesting, as stated by article 246 of the Haitian Criminal Code, “substances which, without giving death, will cause a more-or-less prolonged state of lethargy. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
” The court explained that as it had previously ruled, “[w]here a pendent state claim turns on novel or unresolved questions of state law, especially where those questions concern the state’s interest in the administration of its government, principles of federalism and comity may dictate that these questions be left for decision by the state courts,” citing Seabrook v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 1:17 pm by WIMS
Department of Energy, "20% Wind Energy by 2030" (July 2008), stated that such European shallow-water technology is too expensive and too difficult to site in U.S. waters. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
Union presence during an interrogation of a unit member by the appointing authority Seabrook v City of New York, 57 AD3d 232 Norman Seabrook, individually and as President of the Correction Officers' Benevolent Association, challenged the policy of not allowing an employee to consult with a union representative after a question is posed and before an answer must be given, at an interrogation conducted pursuant to [New York City] Mayoral Executive Order No. 16. [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:29 am
” [Seabrook v Johnston, 660 NY2d 311, United States v Apfelbaum, 445 U.S. 115]. [read post]