Search for: "Seals v. USA" Results 141 - 160 of 205
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm by Christa Culver
LHC Group.Docket: 10-827Issue(s): Must a False Claims Act lawsuit always be dismissed if the lawsuit was not filed under seal at the outset, or is the question of dismissal to be determined by a balancing test? [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 11:45 pm by Gordon Firemark
– Hollywood Reporter www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/who-has-right-parody-keanu-190657 The case is Keeling v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 6:32 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
**Uniloc is discussedOur recent decision in Uniloc USA, Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 4:55 am by Marie Louise
Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (Seattle Trademark Lawyer)   US Trademarks Raid on Seal Team Six trademarks (BlawgIT) (IPBiz)   US Trade Marks – Decisions 9th Circuit: No brief? [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 7:02 am by PaulKostro
GIL & FRANCINE WEISMAN, PRECISION CARS OF ATLANTIC CITY, R&S IMPORTS, RICH FIRE PROTECTION and MERCEDES BENZ USA, LLC, App. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am by The Legal Blog
The Council for Public Interest Law set up by the Ford Foundation in USA defined "public interest litigation" in its report of Public Interest Law, USA, 1976 as follows: "Public Interest Law is the name that has recently been given to efforts provide legal representation to previously unrepresented groups and interests. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am by Kelly
LLC (Gray on Claims) District Court E D Texas: Filing privileged documents under seal and serving opposing parties waives privilege: First American CoreLogic, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 5:21 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
"Massachusetts looking past Electoral College" http://j.mp/ca4oSj masterchef usa has a strong ratings debut ... [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 6:00 am by Bruce Nye
:  In this unpublished, none-citeable business property dispute decision, she and her panel reversed a jury's finding of fraud for lack of substantial evidence.Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC v. [read post]