Search for: "Searle v. Searle"
Results 61 - 80
of 212
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2020, 9:02 am
Katfood Former Katonomist Nicola Searle is looking for participants for her study on trade secrets and cybercrime. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 1:55 am
” – clued-up Kat Nicola Searle recaps the recent multiple IP and research discussions in which the UK industrial strategy has popped up. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 1:40 pm
* Book Review: Innovation & IPRs in China & IndiaKatonomist Nicola Searle is impressed by this book edited by Kung-Chung Liu and Uday S. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 9:26 am
PREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 106 [week ending on Sunday 24 July] | Innovation & IPRs in China & India: Book Review | Paris Tribunal rejects request to filter 'torrent' searches on Bing | Red colour mark reinstated in Germany | Update on Napp v Dr Reddy & Sandoz Litgation | Patent jurisdiction tussle in Rhodia v Molycorp | Decision on ISP liability from Rome | Copyright in the Animal… [read post]
19 May 2010, 5:27 am
[Will @ WaPo; Heartland; Winn v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 11:34 am
As always, the IPKat is here to bring you a quick summary -- the 154th edition of Never Too Late.Book Review: Patent Drawing RulesIPKat Nicola Searle reviews the colouring book Patent Drawing Rules book written by Murray H. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 2:02 pm
Searle & Co., Inc., 358 F.3d 916 (Fed. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 2:02 pm
Searle & Co., Inc., 358 F.3d 916 (Fed. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:36 pm
’” [@ScottKGraham on dissent in Starr v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:30 pm
Searle & Co., 246 F. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 10:42 am
However, here are several of the most common solicitation defences: Lack of Intent For more detail on how this defence looks in practice, see the case of R v Searle below. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 12:15 am
* Book Review: IP Strategy, valuation and damagesNicola Searle gives her verdict on a new book by Michelle Rakiec and Stevan Porter about the evolving world of IP valuation and damages. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 10:43 am
A 1997 ruling by the Maine Supreme Judicial Court in Searles v. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 6:10 pm
Supreme Court in New York Times v. [read post]
Written Description: Description Must do more than Allow PHOSITA to “Envision” the Claimed Invention
7 Sep 2010, 9:30 am
Searle & Co., 358 F.3d 916, 923 (Fed. [read post]
9 May 2017, 9:22 am
” In what should become known as the “Mini Bar Rule,” the court cited Searle v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 9:22 am
” In what should become known as the “Mini Bar Rule,” the court cited Searle v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
Searle & Co., 536 P.2d 1247, 1247-48 (Or. 1975); McEwen v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:53 am
Searle & Co., 705 F. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 9:12 am
Searle, 358 F.3d 916 (Fed. [read post]
