Search for: "Sears v. Rule" Results 41 - 60 of 480
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2018, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Sherita Sears submitted a claim for certain benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law §205-a, claim predicated on an alleged violation of Labor Law §27-a,The Appellate Division ruled that the plaintiff in this action, Sherita Sears, was not entitled to recover under GML §205-a,*as the injuries Jamel Sears had sustained while participating in FST exercises were not the type of occupational injury that Labor Law §27-a** was designed to address. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Sherita Sears submitted a claim for certain benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law §205-a, claim predicated on an alleged violation of Labor Law §27-a,The Appellate Division ruled that the plaintiff in this action, Sherita Sears, was not entitled to recover under GML §205-a,*as the injuries Jamel Sears had sustained while participating in FST exercises were not the type of occupational injury that Labor Law §27-a** was designed to address. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 2:40 am by Andrew Trask
Sears Roebuck & Co. (2012) (2013) And so it is noteworthy that, despite his ruling in Sears, he has also authored the opinion in Parko v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 6:15 am by Bexis
Sears Roebuck & Co., No. 10-2407, slip op. (7th Cir. [read post]