Search for: "Seattle School Dist. v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 40
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2008, 3:17 pm
The Washington Supreme Court held Thursday that random drug testifing of student athletes violates the state constitution's privacy provision, rejecting the state's "special needs" argument and rejecting Vernonia School Dist. 47J v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 5:56 am
Moreover, because the right to practice law is a state-granted privilege that puts an individual's character and fitness at issue, this type of dishonesty in law school-and in connection with obtaining an important position in the federal courts-cannot be said to have `no public ramifications. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 4:51 am by Heidi Henson
Supreme Court’s decisions in Washington v Seattle Sch Dist No 1 (1982) and Hunter v Erickson (1969), the appeals court found that Proposal 2 unconstitutionally altered Michigan’s political structure by impermissibly burdening racial minorities. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:33 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Supreme Court’s decisions in Washington v Seattle Sch Dist No 1 (458 U.S. 457, 1982) and Hunter v Erickson (393 U.S. 385, 1969), the appeals court found that Proposal 2 unconstitutionally altered Michigan’s political structure by impermissibly burdening racial minorities. [read post]