Search for: "Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog" Results 1 - 20 of 1,184
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2018, 2:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
The Ninth Circuit recently addressed a similar issue in Retail Digital Network, LLC v. [read post]
9 Sep 2018, 5:42 am by admin
Fourth Circuit Reverses The fourth circuit reversed the District Court’s holding and found that Williams had willfully violated FBAR requirements. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 2:49 am by Lana Ulrich
City of Chicago case, when it ruled that the 14th Amendment prevents the states as well as the federal government from infringing on the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms for the purpose of self-defense. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 9:26 am by By: Lisa A. Hayes
  Our first concern is substantive: Judge Kavanaugh’s extensive record on the DC Circuit demonstrates that he will not protect the online civil liberties held dear by CDT, including freedom from government surveillance and the protection of free expression online. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 3:25 pm by Colin E. Flora
According to that rule, all Indiana circuit and superior courts have venue in civil cases. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 2:30 pm
Hasbajrami has challenged the government’s warrantless surveillance and is asking the Second Circuit Court of Appeals to throw out the resulting evidence. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
As readers of the blog know, the Second and Seventh Circuits have recognized that the prohibition in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act against “sex” discrimination including discrimination based on “sexual orientation” too. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 5:47 am
For the past decade she has handled Civil Rights and Discrimination cases against employers for race, nationality, gender, age, sexual orientation and religion. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 2:00 pm by Phillips & Associates
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of sex and other factors. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 8:32 am by Anthony Gaughan
As expected, the jury ruled for Tompkins and awarded him $30,000, a verdict affirmed by the Second Circuit. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 9:42 am by Richard S. Zackin
She brought suit against the Department in federal district court under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for gender discrimination, quid pro quo sexual harassment, and hostile work environment sexual harassment. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 4:35 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  In a February 2010 decision (discussed here), then-District Judge Denny Chin entered an order, applying the then-applicable jurisdictional standards under the Second Circuit’s opinion in the Morrison case, granting with prejudice the defendants’ motion to dismiss. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:55 am by Christopher Walker
As Kent Barnett and I have empirically explored in the circuit courts, the ambiguity inquiry at Chevron’s first step is far more exacting than the reasonableness inquiry at the second step. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 5:03 am by Will Baude
The argument to the contrary—that private defendants can't raise the same defenses that would've been available to them at the common law—borders on the absurd: that Congress enacted § 1983 not just to hold government actors liable for civil rights violations, but also to radically expand liability for private parties by silently abrogating all of the common law defenses they'd long enjoyed. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 5:02 am by Ronald K.L. Collins
Defending the free speech rights of neo-Nazis, pornographers, and cross-burners – the speech of white male supremacy – supposedly secures the free speech rights of women and minorities. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 8:57 pm by lawmrh
Allah’s case agreed that these defendants violated his constitutional rights, a split panel of the Second Circuit said they could not be held liable, all because there wasn’t any prior case addressing the “particular practice” used by this prison. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 6:42 am by Eric Goldman
Much of what passes for evidence in the comments section of a blog is not admissible in court. [read post]