Search for: "Second Employers' Liability Cases" Results 1 - 20 of 4,782
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2020, 2:58 pm by Lebowitz & Mzhen
A state court recently heard a medical malpractice case involving the alleged vicarious liability of two different employers. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 12:56 pm by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
The second means of employer liability is that of strict liability via the position of the employer, known as vicarious liability. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 12:56 pm by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
The second means of employer liability is that of strict liability via the position of the employer, known as vicarious liability. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 12:12 pm
The court did not, however, find successor liability in this case because the acquiring company specifically did not acquire the facility or employees that triggered the liability. [read post]
In addressing these questions, the Court of Appeals reformulated the second and third queries as discussed below, to make them more broadly applicable beyond the parameters of this particular case. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 4:28 pm by Burton A. Padove
If a driver was acting in the course and scope of employment or was operating an employer’s vehicle, the company could find itself facing claims of vicarious liability. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 5:08 pm by Michelman & Robinson LLP
In another blow to California employers, a California appellate court recently broadened the liability risk employers face for class action lawsuits. [read post]
23 May 2021, 2:04 pm by vforberger
Many employers think that incorporation protects them from individual liability. [read post]
21 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Nicholas Saady
”The second scenario arises where one employer employs “a worker for one set of hours in a workweek, and another employer employs the same employee for a separate set of hours in the same workweek. [read post]
In a decision of import to employers and contractors in particular, the First Circuit Court of Appeals has limited the scope of a commercial general liability policy’s “employer liability” exclusionary endorsement, finding that in the case of contractors and subcontractors, the exclusion applies only to bodily injury claims brought by persons who have contracted directly with the policyholder. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 12:17 pm by Sharifi Firm, PLC
Ultimately, the court affirmed the lower court’s decision to dismiss the plaintiff’s case based on the fact that the plaintiff’s theory of liability on appeal (which was only slightly different from the theory of liability at trial) was not raised below. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 7:27 am by Mavrick Law Firm
Continue reading → The post DEFENDING FORT LAUDERDALE EMPLOYERS: CORONAVIRUS RESPONSE ACT EMPLOYER LIABILITY appeared first on Florida Business Litigation Lawyer Blog. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 10:46 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
This principle may also be used in a sexual harassment case brought by an employee against a co-employee and by vicarious liability, against the employer. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 10:46 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
This principle may also be used in a sexual harassment case brought by an employee against a co-employee and by vicarious liability, against the employer. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 12:42 pm by Pulgini & Norton, LLP
In this case, the Board assessed whether in this successive insurer situation, the second employer could potentially be responsible for compensating the employee for work-related injuries. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 5:32 am
We started off with a bang, as SCOTUS issued two wins for employers in what I'll call "pure" employment law cases:First, the Court adopted a narrow definition of "supervisor" for Title VII employer liability analysis. [read post]